TY - JOUR
T1 - Vascular e-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic
T2 - The EL-COVID Survey
AU - Patelis, Nikolaos
AU - Bisdas, Theodosios
AU - Jing, Zaiping
AU - Feng, Jiaxuan
AU - Trenner, Matthias
AU - Tri Nugroho, Nyityasmono
AU - Ocke Reis, Paulo Eduardo
AU - Elkouri, Stephane
AU - Lecis, Alexandre
AU - Karam, Lamisse
AU - Roux, Dirk Le
AU - Ionac, Mihai
AU - Berczeli, Marton
AU - Jongkind, Vincent
AU - Yeung, Kak Khee
AU - Katsargyris, Athanasios
AU - Avgerinos, Efthymios
AU - Moris, Demetrios
AU - Choong, Andrew
AU - Ng, Jun Jie
AU - Cvjetko, Ivan
AU - Antoniou, George A.
AU - Ghibu, Phil
AU - Svetlikov, Alexei
AU - Pedrajas, Fernando Gallardo
AU - Ebben, Harm
AU - Stepak, Hubert
AU - Chornuy, Andrii
AU - Kostiv, Sviatoslav
AU - Ancetti, Stefano
AU - Tadayon, Niki
AU - Mekkar, Akli
AU - Magnitskiy, Leonid
AU - Fidalgo-Domingos, Liliana
AU - Matheiken, Sean
AU - Sarutte Rosello, Eduardo Sebastian
AU - Isik, Arda
AU - Kirkilesis, Georgios
AU - Kakavia, Kyriaki
AU - Georgopoulos, Sotirios
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Background: The corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has radically changed the possibilities for vascular surgeons and trainees to exchange knowledge and experience. The aim of the present survey is to inventorize the e-learning needs of vascular surgeons and trainees as well as the strengths and weaknesses of vascular e-Learning. Methods: An online survey consisting of 18 questions was created in English, with a separate bilingual English-Mandarin version. The survey was dispersed to vascular surgeons and trainees worldwide through social media and via direct messaging from June 15, 2020 to October 15, 2020. Results: Eight hundred and fifty-six records from 84 different countries could be included. Most participants attended several online activities (>4: n = 461, 54%; 2–4: n = 300, 35%; 1: n = 95, 11%) and evaluated online activities as positive or very positive (84.7%). In deciding upon participation, the topic of the activity was most important (n = 440, 51.4%), followed by the reputation of the presenter or the panel (n = 178, 20.8%), but not necessarily receiving accreditation or certification (n = 52, 6.1%). The survey identified several shortcomings in vascular e-Learning during the pandemic: limited possibility to attend due to lack of time and increased workload (n = 432, 50.5%), no protected/allocated time (n = 488, 57%) and no accreditation or certification, while technical shortcomings were only a minor problem (n = 25, 2.9%). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic vascular e-Learning has been used frequently and was appreciated by vascular professionals from around the globe. The survey identified strengths and weaknesses in current e-Learning that can be used to further improve online learning in vascular surgery.
AB - Background: The corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has radically changed the possibilities for vascular surgeons and trainees to exchange knowledge and experience. The aim of the present survey is to inventorize the e-learning needs of vascular surgeons and trainees as well as the strengths and weaknesses of vascular e-Learning. Methods: An online survey consisting of 18 questions was created in English, with a separate bilingual English-Mandarin version. The survey was dispersed to vascular surgeons and trainees worldwide through social media and via direct messaging from June 15, 2020 to October 15, 2020. Results: Eight hundred and fifty-six records from 84 different countries could be included. Most participants attended several online activities (>4: n = 461, 54%; 2–4: n = 300, 35%; 1: n = 95, 11%) and evaluated online activities as positive or very positive (84.7%). In deciding upon participation, the topic of the activity was most important (n = 440, 51.4%), followed by the reputation of the presenter or the panel (n = 178, 20.8%), but not necessarily receiving accreditation or certification (n = 52, 6.1%). The survey identified several shortcomings in vascular e-Learning during the pandemic: limited possibility to attend due to lack of time and increased workload (n = 432, 50.5%), no protected/allocated time (n = 488, 57%) and no accreditation or certification, while technical shortcomings were only a minor problem (n = 25, 2.9%). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic vascular e-Learning has been used frequently and was appreciated by vascular professionals from around the globe. The survey identified strengths and weaknesses in current e-Learning that can be used to further improve online learning in vascular surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115056401&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.08.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 34478845
AN - SCOPUS:85115056401
SN - 0890-5096
VL - 77
SP - 63
EP - 70
JO - Annals of Vascular Surgery
JF - Annals of Vascular Surgery
ER -