TY - JOUR
T1 - Utilization of monosodium glutamate (MSG) for the synthesis of 1,8-dioxoacridine and polyhydro-quinoline derivates with SiO2-AA-glutamate catalyst and antioxidant ability test
AU - Cahyana, A. H.
AU - Andika, T.
AU - Liandi, A. R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Derivatives of 1,8-dioxoacridine and polyhydro-quinoline compounds are active compounds that have several beneficial bioactivities. The purpose of this research is to synthesize 1,8-dioxoacridine and polyhydro-quinoline derivatives supported by SiO2-AA-Glu as the catalyst and test their antioxidant activity. The reaction was conducted at the optimum condition with ethanol solvent at boiling point temperature (78 C) for 60 min with a catalyst concentration of 3 % mol with a yield of 88.16 %. Analysis of formation products was confirmed using FTIR, UV-Vis Spectrophotometer, and GC-MS. The results of the analysis produced three 1,8-dioxoacridine and polyhydro-quinoline derivatives, namely 3,3,6,6-tetramethyl-9-phenyl-3,4,6,7,9,10-hexahydro-2H,5H-acridine-1,8-dione (compound 1), 9-(4-hydroxy-phenyl)-3,3,6,6-tetramethyl-3,4,6,7,9,10-hexahydro-2H,5H-acridine-1,8-dione (compound 2), and 7,7-dimethyl-5-oxo-4-phenyl-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-quinoline-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (compound 3). Compound 2 shows the best activity as an antioxidant compared to the other two compounds with an IC50 value of 83.72 ppm.
AB - Derivatives of 1,8-dioxoacridine and polyhydro-quinoline compounds are active compounds that have several beneficial bioactivities. The purpose of this research is to synthesize 1,8-dioxoacridine and polyhydro-quinoline derivatives supported by SiO2-AA-Glu as the catalyst and test their antioxidant activity. The reaction was conducted at the optimum condition with ethanol solvent at boiling point temperature (78 C) for 60 min with a catalyst concentration of 3 % mol with a yield of 88.16 %. Analysis of formation products was confirmed using FTIR, UV-Vis Spectrophotometer, and GC-MS. The results of the analysis produced three 1,8-dioxoacridine and polyhydro-quinoline derivatives, namely 3,3,6,6-tetramethyl-9-phenyl-3,4,6,7,9,10-hexahydro-2H,5H-acridine-1,8-dione (compound 1), 9-(4-hydroxy-phenyl)-3,3,6,6-tetramethyl-3,4,6,7,9,10-hexahydro-2H,5H-acridine-1,8-dione (compound 2), and 7,7-dimethyl-5-oxo-4-phenyl-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-quinoline-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (compound 3). Compound 2 shows the best activity as an antioxidant compared to the other two compounds with an IC50 value of 83.72 ppm.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096468343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1757-899X/902/1/012071
DO - 10.1088/1757-899X/902/1/012071
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85096468343
SN - 1757-8981
VL - 902
JO - IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
JF - IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
IS - 1
M1 - 012071
T2 - 4th International Symposium on Current Progress in Functional Materials, ISCPFM 2019
Y2 - 6 November 2019 through 7 November 2019
ER -