TY - JOUR
T1 - Unsuccessful delivery of tetrandrine from colon-targeted dosage forms comprising alginate/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and alginate–chitosan beads
AU - Iswandana, Raditya
AU - Mutia, Metah Putri
AU - Widyaningrum, Farahia Khairina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Objective: The objective of this study was to optimize the formulations of antifibrotic tetrandrine beads using alginate and various concentrations of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) and chitosan. Methods: Beads were formulated with six (F1–F6) concentrations of polymer and were then characterized using scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and X-ray diffraction; these beads were used for measurements of moisture contents, swelling, and in vitro drug release. Results: Beads with the highest concentrations of HPMC and chitosan produced the highest entrapment efficiencies of 49.83% and 50.71%, respectively. Moreover, drug release under stomach conditions (HCl pH 1.2 medium) was restricted to 75.01%, 61.01%, 51.86%, 74.84%, 66.00%, and 41.63% with increasing HPMC and chitosan concentrations (F1–F6, respectively). Conclusion: Beads of all formulations showed inadequate retention of tetrandrine under pH conditions of the upper gastrointestinal tract and would likely be unsuccessful as colon-targeted dosage forms.
AB - Objective: The objective of this study was to optimize the formulations of antifibrotic tetrandrine beads using alginate and various concentrations of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) and chitosan. Methods: Beads were formulated with six (F1–F6) concentrations of polymer and were then characterized using scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and X-ray diffraction; these beads were used for measurements of moisture contents, swelling, and in vitro drug release. Results: Beads with the highest concentrations of HPMC and chitosan produced the highest entrapment efficiencies of 49.83% and 50.71%, respectively. Moreover, drug release under stomach conditions (HCl pH 1.2 medium) was restricted to 75.01%, 61.01%, 51.86%, 74.84%, 66.00%, and 41.63% with increasing HPMC and chitosan concentrations (F1–F6, respectively). Conclusion: Beads of all formulations showed inadequate retention of tetrandrine under pH conditions of the upper gastrointestinal tract and would likely be unsuccessful as colon-targeted dosage forms.
KW - Alginate
KW - Antifibrotic tetrandrine beads
KW - Chitosan
KW - Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
KW - Ionic gelation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059803816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.22159/ijap.2018.v10s1.88
DO - 10.22159/ijap.2018.v10s1.88
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85059803816
SN - 0975-7058
VL - 10
SP - 396
EP - 402
JO - International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics
JF - International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics
IS - Special Issue 1
ER -