TY - JOUR
T1 - Ultrasonography evaluation of the normal ulnar nerve in adult
T2 - Comparison of the cross-sectional area at elbow extension and flexion
AU - Prasetyo, Marcel
AU - Rahardja, Reiner Reza
AU - Yanuar, Ahmad
AU - Prihartono, Joedo
AU - Setiawan, Stefanus Imanuel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Background: Cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement of the ulnar nerve in the adult population by using ultrasonography (US) at elbow extension and flexion has previously been reported, but not much evidence showed a significant difference between elbow extension and flexion position. Purpose: To compare the ulnar nerve CSA between elbow extension and flexion position. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted by involving 36 healthy adults with normally functioning ulnar nerve proven by Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) or Electroneurography. The ulnar nerve CSA was measured on each elbow by using US at the level of the medial epicondyle, 2 cm distal and 2 cm proximal from the medial epicondyle. Results: The average ulnar nerve CSA at the medial epicondyle, 2 cm distal and proximal to the medial epicondyle at elbow extension respectively were 5.95 ± 0.74 mm2, 6.27 ± 0.92 mm2, and 5.92 ± 0.73 mm2. At elbow flexion, the average ulnar nerve CSA at the positions was 5.70 ± 0.83 mm2, 5.23 ± 0.87 mm2, dan 5.73 ± 0.71 mm2 respectively. The CSA of the ulnar nerve at elbow extension was significantly larger compared to the flexion position in the three areas observed in this study (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The CSA of the ulnar nerve at elbow extension position was larger compared to the flexion position. Elbow position should be considered in measuring CSA of the ulnar nerve.
AB - Background: Cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement of the ulnar nerve in the adult population by using ultrasonography (US) at elbow extension and flexion has previously been reported, but not much evidence showed a significant difference between elbow extension and flexion position. Purpose: To compare the ulnar nerve CSA between elbow extension and flexion position. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted by involving 36 healthy adults with normally functioning ulnar nerve proven by Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) or Electroneurography. The ulnar nerve CSA was measured on each elbow by using US at the level of the medial epicondyle, 2 cm distal and 2 cm proximal from the medial epicondyle. Results: The average ulnar nerve CSA at the medial epicondyle, 2 cm distal and proximal to the medial epicondyle at elbow extension respectively were 5.95 ± 0.74 mm2, 6.27 ± 0.92 mm2, and 5.92 ± 0.73 mm2. At elbow flexion, the average ulnar nerve CSA at the positions was 5.70 ± 0.83 mm2, 5.23 ± 0.87 mm2, dan 5.73 ± 0.71 mm2 respectively. The CSA of the ulnar nerve at elbow extension was significantly larger compared to the flexion position in the three areas observed in this study (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The CSA of the ulnar nerve at elbow extension position was larger compared to the flexion position. Elbow position should be considered in measuring CSA of the ulnar nerve.
KW - Cross-sectional area
KW - Medial epicondyle
KW - Ulnar nerve
KW - Ultrasonography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101370509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100331
DO - 10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100331
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85101370509
SN - 2352-0477
VL - 8
JO - European Journal of Radiology Open
JF - European Journal of Radiology Open
M1 - 100331
ER -