Three-dimensional model printing in oral and maxillofacial reconstructive surgery: Comparison of three-dimensional models and multislice computed tomography scans

Mohammad Adhitya Latief; null Pradono; Cholid Badri

doi:10.22159/ijap.2017.v9s2.18

Three-dimensional model printing in oral and maxillofacial reconstructive surgery: Comparison of three-dimensional models and multislice computed tomography scans

Mohammad Adhitya Latief, Pradono, Cholid Badri

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare fabrication of commonly used three-dimensional (3D) models with original multislice computed tomography (MSCT) scan data for accuracy and precision in reconstruction surgery. Methods: MSCT data from 10 samples are processed and manufactured to be 3D models. Both groups are then measured and analyzed for the purpose of comparison. Results: The average mandibular measurement difference between 3D models and MSCT scans is 0.26 mm more <2%. The final results of the comparison reveal high accuracy in 3D models compared to MSCT scan data. Conclusion: The 3D model could be considered as surgical guidance for maxillofacial reconstruction surgery since it yields highly accurate results.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	74-78
Number of pages	5
Journal	International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics
Volume	9
Issue number	Special Issue 2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2017.v9s2.18
Publication status	Published - Dec 2017

Keywords

Computer-aided design
Reconstructive surgery
Three-dimensional model

Access to Document

10.22159/ijap.2017.v9s2.18

Cite this

@article{ff16adf0b1354ed390dd4a6fdcfb8988,

title = "Three-dimensional model printing in oral and maxillofacial reconstructive surgery: Comparison of three-dimensional models and multislice computed tomography scans",

abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study is to compare fabrication of commonly used three-dimensional (3D) models with original multislice computed tomography (MSCT) scan data for accuracy and precision in reconstruction surgery. Methods: MSCT data from 10 samples are processed and manufactured to be 3D models. Both groups are then measured and analyzed for the purpose of comparison. Results: The average mandibular measurement difference between 3D models and MSCT scans is 0.26 mm more <2%. The final results of the comparison reveal high accuracy in 3D models compared to MSCT scan data. Conclusion: The 3D model could be considered as surgical guidance for maxillofacial reconstruction surgery since it yields highly accurate results.",

keywords = "Computer-aided design, Reconstructive surgery, Three-dimensional model",

author = "Latief, {Mohammad Adhitya} and Pradono and Cholid Badri",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 The Authors. Published by Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd.",

year = "2017",

month = dec,

doi = "10.22159/ijap.2017.v9s2.18",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

pages = "74--78",

journal = "International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics",

issn = "0975-7058",

publisher = "International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics",

number = "Special Issue 2",

}

Three-dimensional model printing in oral and maxillofacial reconstructive surgery: Comparison of three-dimensional models and multislice computed tomography scans. / Latief, Mohammad Adhitya; Pradono; Badri, Cholid.
In: International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, Vol. 9, No. Special Issue 2, 12.2017, p. 74-78.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three-dimensional model printing in oral and maxillofacial reconstructive surgery

T2 - Comparison of three-dimensional models and multislice computed tomography scans

AU - Latief, Mohammad Adhitya

AU - Pradono, null

AU - Badri, Cholid

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Objective: The objective of this study is to compare fabrication of commonly used three-dimensional (3D) models with original multislice computed tomography (MSCT) scan data for accuracy and precision in reconstruction surgery. Methods: MSCT data from 10 samples are processed and manufactured to be 3D models. Both groups are then measured and analyzed for the purpose of comparison. Results: The average mandibular measurement difference between 3D models and MSCT scans is 0.26 mm more <2%. The final results of the comparison reveal high accuracy in 3D models compared to MSCT scan data. Conclusion: The 3D model could be considered as surgical guidance for maxillofacial reconstruction surgery since it yields highly accurate results.

AB - Objective: The objective of this study is to compare fabrication of commonly used three-dimensional (3D) models with original multislice computed tomography (MSCT) scan data for accuracy and precision in reconstruction surgery. Methods: MSCT data from 10 samples are processed and manufactured to be 3D models. Both groups are then measured and analyzed for the purpose of comparison. Results: The average mandibular measurement difference between 3D models and MSCT scans is 0.26 mm more <2%. The final results of the comparison reveal high accuracy in 3D models compared to MSCT scan data. Conclusion: The 3D model could be considered as surgical guidance for maxillofacial reconstruction surgery since it yields highly accurate results.

KW - Computer-aided design

KW - Reconstructive surgery

KW - Three-dimensional model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042006376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.22159/ijap.2017.v9s2.18

DO - 10.22159/ijap.2017.v9s2.18

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042006376

SN - 0975-7058

VL - 9

SP - 74

EP - 78

JO - International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics

JF - International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics

IS - Special Issue 2

ER -

Three-dimensional model printing in oral and maxillofacial reconstructive surgery: Comparison of three-dimensional models and multislice computed tomography scans

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this