TY - JOUR
T1 - The stigma paradox
T2 - Perception of quality-of-life in people with epilepsy among themselves, the family, and the general population in Indonesian urban areas
AU - Budikayanti, Astri
AU - Primardi, Aska
AU - Indrawati, Luh Ari
AU - Hamid, Donny
AU - Indriyani, Julintari
AU - Rahmi, Izati
AU - Andre,
AU - Supriyatna, Agus
AU - Hamdani, Ismi Adhanisa
AU - Listyaningrum, Dina
AU - Fakhrunnisa, Fakhrunnisa
AU - Wiratman, Winnugroho
AU - Octaviana, Fitri
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Indonesian Neurological Association , Jakarta, Indonesia; with grant number of 006/S.K/Jaya/III/2019 .
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Indonesian Neurological Association, Jakarta, Indonesia; with grant number of 006/S.K/Jaya/III/2019.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Objective: To understand quality of life (QoL) perceptions of people with epilepsy (PWE) through knowledge, attitude, and behavior (KAB); PWE; their families (PWEf); and the general population (GPop). Methods: This descriptive study was conducted in Jakarta and its surrounding cities from January to December 2019. PWE were recruited from outpatient clinics. PWEf were caregivers who lived with PWE. GPop were age matched, randomly selected, and interviewed for public events. The perception of QoL was scaled from 1 to 5 (1 =very poor to 5 =very good). KAB was obtained from open- and closed-ended questionnaires, scaled from 1 to 5 (1 =strongly disagree to 5 =strongly agree). The differences in each group were analyzed using t-tests and analysis of variance. Results: We interviewed 371 participants, predominantly female and senior high school graduates. Unemployment and singlehood were higher in PWEs. QoL perception in PWE was similar to GPop (3.01 [0.75] vs. 3.07 [0.76], p = 0.49), yet lower in PWEf (2.78 [0.76]; p < 0.05). According to PWE and PWEf, not being stigmatized and support from family were essential, while GPop emphasized the medical perspective. Overall, the knowledge section had the lowest score and behavior had the highest. The GPop was uncertain about the cause of epilepsy in K2 (3.73 [1.05]), K4 (3.35 [1.24]), and K7 (2.93 [1.08]); p < 0.001. Despite positive behavior, GPop were unwilling to marry (B4) nor had PWE as their in-laws (B5); (2.83 [0.73] and 2.78 [0.77]; p < 0.001). Moreover, PWEf were still doubtful about GPop's acceptance (B1) (3.86 [0.38] vs 4.00 [0.40]; p < 0.05). Conclusion: The perception of QoL in PWE did not seem to be directly associated with KAB. Despite similar knowledge of PWE and PWEf, better perceptions came from PWE and GPop. The reluctance to form deeper bonds between GPop and PWE, along with PWEf's skepticism, could lead to low self-esteem, unemployment, and unmarried rates. Further studies are required to elaborate on these issues.
AB - Objective: To understand quality of life (QoL) perceptions of people with epilepsy (PWE) through knowledge, attitude, and behavior (KAB); PWE; their families (PWEf); and the general population (GPop). Methods: This descriptive study was conducted in Jakarta and its surrounding cities from January to December 2019. PWE were recruited from outpatient clinics. PWEf were caregivers who lived with PWE. GPop were age matched, randomly selected, and interviewed for public events. The perception of QoL was scaled from 1 to 5 (1 =very poor to 5 =very good). KAB was obtained from open- and closed-ended questionnaires, scaled from 1 to 5 (1 =strongly disagree to 5 =strongly agree). The differences in each group were analyzed using t-tests and analysis of variance. Results: We interviewed 371 participants, predominantly female and senior high school graduates. Unemployment and singlehood were higher in PWEs. QoL perception in PWE was similar to GPop (3.01 [0.75] vs. 3.07 [0.76], p = 0.49), yet lower in PWEf (2.78 [0.76]; p < 0.05). According to PWE and PWEf, not being stigmatized and support from family were essential, while GPop emphasized the medical perspective. Overall, the knowledge section had the lowest score and behavior had the highest. The GPop was uncertain about the cause of epilepsy in K2 (3.73 [1.05]), K4 (3.35 [1.24]), and K7 (2.93 [1.08]); p < 0.001. Despite positive behavior, GPop were unwilling to marry (B4) nor had PWE as their in-laws (B5); (2.83 [0.73] and 2.78 [0.77]; p < 0.001). Moreover, PWEf were still doubtful about GPop's acceptance (B1) (3.86 [0.38] vs 4.00 [0.40]; p < 0.05). Conclusion: The perception of QoL in PWE did not seem to be directly associated with KAB. Despite similar knowledge of PWE and PWEf, better perceptions came from PWE and GPop. The reluctance to form deeper bonds between GPop and PWE, along with PWEf's skepticism, could lead to low self-esteem, unemployment, and unmarried rates. Further studies are required to elaborate on these issues.
KW - Attitude
KW - Behavior
KW - Epilepsy
KW - Knowledge
KW - Quality of life
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129486360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106938
DO - 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106938
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85129486360
SN - 0920-1211
VL - 183
JO - Epilepsy Research
JF - Epilepsy Research
M1 - 106938
ER -