The state of Continuing Professional Development in East and Southeast Asia among the medical practitioners

Dujeepa D. Samarasekera, Shuh Shing Lee, Su Ping Yeo, Julie Chen, Ardi Findyartini, Nadia Greviana, Budi Wiweko, Vishna Devi Nadarajah, Chandramani Thuraisingham, Jen Hung Yang, Lawrence Sherman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Continuing medical education and continuing professional development activities (CME/CPD) improve the practice of medical practitioners and allowing them to deliver quality clinical care. However, the systems that oversee CME/CPD as well as the processes around design, delivery, and accreditation vary widely across countries. This study explores the state of CME/CPD in the East and South East Asian region from the perspective of medical practitioners, and makes recommendations for improvement. Methods: A multi-centre study was conducted across five institutions in Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan. The study instrument was a 28-item (27 five-point Likert scale and 1 open-ended items) validated questionnaire that focused on perceptions of the current content, processes and gaps in CME/CPD and further contextualised by educational experts from each participating site. Descriptive analysis was undertaken for quantitative data while the data from open-ended item was categorised into similar categories. Results: A total of 867 medical practitioners participated in the study. For perceptions on current CME/CPD programme, 75.34% to 88.00% of respondents agreed that CME/CPD increased their skills and competence in providing quality clinical care. For the domain on pharmaceutical industry-supported CME/CPD, the issue of commercial influence was apparent with only 30.24%-56.92% of respondents believing that the CME/CPD in their institution was free from commercial bias. Key areas for improvement for future CME/CPD included 1) content and mode of delivery, 2) independence and funding, 3) administration, 4) location and accessibility and 5) policy and collaboration. Conclusion: Accessible, practice-relevant content using diverse learning modalities offered by unbiased content providers and subject to transparent and rigorous accreditation processes with minimal administrative hassle are the main considerations for CME/CPD participants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalAsia Pacific Scholar
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • Accreditation
  • Continuing Medical Education
  • Continuing Professional Development
  • Health Profession Education
  • Medical Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The state of Continuing Professional Development in East and Southeast Asia among the medical practitioners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this