Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the role of bank size, capital, and funding structure to the systemic risk in ASEAN-5 countries during period 2004- 2014. The systemic risk is measured by Marginal Expected Shortfall (MES) and SRISK. Using panel regression, we find that systemic risk measured by MES has a positive relationship with bank size, but it has inverse relationship with capital using both MES and SRISK. However, the funding structure has a small effect on systemic risk compare to size and capital. Our findings provide a justification of Basel III's proposition that bank capital requirement tightening would reduce systemic risk.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 447-457 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | International Journal of Economics and Management |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 2 Special Issue |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2017 |
Keywords
- Bank fragility
- Bank performance
- Financial crisis
- Southeast Asia
- Systemic risk