TY - JOUR
T1 - The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Polyp and Adenoma Detection Rate During Colonoscopy
T2 - Systematic-Review and Meta-Analysis
AU - Adiwinata, Randy
AU - Tandarto, Kevin
AU - Arifputra, Jonathan
AU - Waleleng, Bradley Jimmy
AU - Gosal, Fandy
AU - Rotty, Luciana
AU - Winarta, Jeanne
AU - Waleleng, Andrew
AU - Simadibrata, Paulus
AU - Simadibrata, Marcellus
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: Colonoscopy may detect colorectal polyp and facilitate its removal in order to prevent colorectal cancer. However, substantial miss rate for colorectal adenomas detection still occurred during screening colonoscopy procedure. Nowadays, artificial intelligence (AI) have been employed in trials to improve polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). Therefore, we would like to determine the impact of AI in increasing PDR and ADR. Methods: The present study adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 (PRISMA 2020) statement. To identify relevant literature, comprehensive searches were conducted on major scientific databases, including Pubmed, EBSCO-host, and Proquest. The search was limited to articles published up to November 30, 2022. Inclusion criteria for the study encompassed full-text accessibility, articles written in the English language, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported both ADR and PDR values, comparing conventional diagnostic methods with AI-aided approaches. To synthesize the data, we computed the combined pooled odds ratio (OR) using a random-effects model. This model was chosen due to the expectation of considerable heterogeneity among the selected studies. To evaluate potential publication bias, the Begg’s funnel diagram was employed. Results: A total of 13 studies were included in this study. Colonoscopy with AI had significantly higher PDR compared to without AI (pooled OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.13–1.89, p = 0.003) and higher ADR (pooled OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.37–1.82, p < 0.00001). PDR analysis showed moderate heterogeneity between included studies (p = 0.004; I2=63%). Furthermore, ADR analysis showed moderate heterogeneity (p < 0.007; I2 = 57%). Additionally, the funnels plot of ADR and PDR analysis showed an asymmetry plot and low publication bias. Conclusion: AI may improve colonoscopy result quality through improving PDR and ADR.
AB - Introduction: Colonoscopy may detect colorectal polyp and facilitate its removal in order to prevent colorectal cancer. However, substantial miss rate for colorectal adenomas detection still occurred during screening colonoscopy procedure. Nowadays, artificial intelligence (AI) have been employed in trials to improve polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). Therefore, we would like to determine the impact of AI in increasing PDR and ADR. Methods: The present study adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 (PRISMA 2020) statement. To identify relevant literature, comprehensive searches were conducted on major scientific databases, including Pubmed, EBSCO-host, and Proquest. The search was limited to articles published up to November 30, 2022. Inclusion criteria for the study encompassed full-text accessibility, articles written in the English language, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported both ADR and PDR values, comparing conventional diagnostic methods with AI-aided approaches. To synthesize the data, we computed the combined pooled odds ratio (OR) using a random-effects model. This model was chosen due to the expectation of considerable heterogeneity among the selected studies. To evaluate potential publication bias, the Begg’s funnel diagram was employed. Results: A total of 13 studies were included in this study. Colonoscopy with AI had significantly higher PDR compared to without AI (pooled OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.13–1.89, p = 0.003) and higher ADR (pooled OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.37–1.82, p < 0.00001). PDR analysis showed moderate heterogeneity between included studies (p = 0.004; I2=63%). Furthermore, ADR analysis showed moderate heterogeneity (p < 0.007; I2 = 57%). Additionally, the funnels plot of ADR and PDR analysis showed an asymmetry plot and low publication bias. Conclusion: AI may improve colonoscopy result quality through improving PDR and ADR.
KW - adenoma detection rate
KW - Artificial intelligencel
KW - colonoscopy
KW - polyp detection rate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178496441&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.11.3655
DO - 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.11.3655
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38019222
AN - SCOPUS:85178496441
SN - 1513-7368
VL - 24
SP - 3655
EP - 3663
JO - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
JF - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
IS - 11
ER -