Abstract
This paper examines the effects of mandatory health insurance on access and equity in access to public and private outpatient care in Indonesia. Data from the second round of the 1997 Indonesian Family Life Survey were used. We adopted the concentration index as a measure of equity, and this was calculated from actual data and from predicted probability of outpatient-care use saved from a multinomial logit regression. The study found that a mandatory insurance scheme for civil servants (Askes) had a strongly positive impact on access to public outpatient care, while a mandatory insurance scheme for private employees (Jamsostek) had a positive impact on access to both public and private outpatient care. The greatest effects of Jamsostek were observed amongst poor beneficiaries. A substantial increase in access will be gained by expanding insurance to the whole population. However, neither Askes nor Jamsostek had a positive impact on equity. Policy implications are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 322-335 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Health policy and planning |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2004 |
Keywords
- Access
- Concentration index
- Equity
- Health insurance
- IFLS
- Indonesia