TY - CHAP
T1 - THE EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, GOVERNANCE, AND CONTROVERSIES ON FIRMS’ VALUE
T2 - EVIDENCE FROM ASIA
AU - Melinda, Anna
AU - Wardhani, Ratna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - With the increasing understanding of stakeholders on sustainability aspects for the business, companies are nowadays paying more attention to environmental and social issues. This study aims to examine the relationship between Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Index and firms’ value. Moreover, this study also examines how the controversy score influences the company’s value. The authors employ a dataset of 1.356 companies from 22 countries in Asia which representing the Asian market from 2014 to 2018. This study shows that ESG index score and controversy score are statistically significant, affecting the firms’ value, measured by Tobin’s Q. From the individual tests, the findings of this study indicate that ESG-environmental, ESG-social, and ESG-governance, individually affect the firms’ value. This study suggests that providing disclosure on ESG aspects is essential, not only to increase company value but also to show the company resilience and sustainability. On the other hand, ESG controversy score surprisingly indicates a positive relationship with the company value. The result implies that controversies provide a positive signal to the investor because controversies could provide a signal to the public of companies’ willingness to have transparency and accountability.
AB - With the increasing understanding of stakeholders on sustainability aspects for the business, companies are nowadays paying more attention to environmental and social issues. This study aims to examine the relationship between Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Index and firms’ value. Moreover, this study also examines how the controversy score influences the company’s value. The authors employ a dataset of 1.356 companies from 22 countries in Asia which representing the Asian market from 2014 to 2018. This study shows that ESG index score and controversy score are statistically significant, affecting the firms’ value, measured by Tobin’s Q. From the individual tests, the findings of this study indicate that ESG-environmental, ESG-social, and ESG-governance, individually affect the firms’ value. This study suggests that providing disclosure on ESG aspects is essential, not only to increase company value but also to show the company resilience and sustainability. On the other hand, ESG controversy score surprisingly indicates a positive relationship with the company value. The result implies that controversies provide a positive signal to the investor because controversies could provide a signal to the public of companies’ willingness to have transparency and accountability.
KW - Environmental, Social, Governance
KW - ESG controversies
KW - firm value
KW - sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103596172&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/S1571-038620200000027011
DO - 10.1108/S1571-038620200000027011
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85103596172
T3 - International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics
SP - 147
EP - 173
BT - International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics
PB - Emerald Publishing Limited
ER -