TY - GEN
T1 - The comparison of an analytical, experimental, and simulation approach for the average induced velocity of a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD)
AU - Harinaldi,
AU - Wibowo, Adhika S.
AU - Julian, James
AU - Budiarso,
PY - 2019/1/25
Y1 - 2019/1/25
N2 - Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) is an active flow control device which works by ionizing the surrounding air, and controls it to achieve a desirable result. A model of the DBD has already been made, however most of them must be solved numerically. There hasn't been any simplified non numerical model that could describe the power of a DBD. In this research, an analytical 2D equation is purposed to obtain the average velocity produced by a DBD. For validation, this equation is compared to a simulation and experimental data, which is conducted at a varying freestream velocity ranging from l to 3 m/s and also a varying dielectric thickness from 3 to 6 mm. The three of them shows good agreement on dielectric thickness of 3 mm and 4 mm with an error of 5.79% for the analytical and experimental, 2.95% for the simulation and experimental and 5.34% for the analytical and simulation. At the dielectric thickness of 6 mm some of the analytical model assumption is no longer valid, and thus a comparison couldn't be done.
AB - Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) is an active flow control device which works by ionizing the surrounding air, and controls it to achieve a desirable result. A model of the DBD has already been made, however most of them must be solved numerically. There hasn't been any simplified non numerical model that could describe the power of a DBD. In this research, an analytical 2D equation is purposed to obtain the average velocity produced by a DBD. For validation, this equation is compared to a simulation and experimental data, which is conducted at a varying freestream velocity ranging from l to 3 m/s and also a varying dielectric thickness from 3 to 6 mm. The three of them shows good agreement on dielectric thickness of 3 mm and 4 mm with an error of 5.79% for the analytical and experimental, 2.95% for the simulation and experimental and 5.34% for the analytical and simulation. At the dielectric thickness of 6 mm some of the analytical model assumption is no longer valid, and thus a comparison couldn't be done.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061126796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/1.5086574
DO - 10.1063/1.5086574
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85061126796
T3 - AIP Conference Proceedings
BT - 10th International Meeting of Advances in Thermofluids, IMAT 2018 - Smart City
A2 - Yatim, Ardiyansyah
A2 - Nasruddin, null
A2 - Budiyanto, Muhammad Arif
A2 - Aisyah, Nyayu
A2 - Alhamid, Muhamad Idrus
PB - American Institute of Physics Inc.
T2 - 10th International Meeting of Advances in Thermofluids - Smart City: Advances in Thermofluid Technology in Tropical Urban Development, IMAT 2018
Y2 - 16 November 2018 through 17 November 2018
ER -