Textile and texture in Tanah Abang Market: architectural evolution from the colonial to the post-colonial era

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Historical studies are crucial in urban analysis. Cities are spatial productions shaped by intertwined layers of time. One of the key elements in interpreting a city is its market, which serves not only as an economic and social hub but also as a political center where diverse interests vie for prominence and influence. This study delves into the historical significance of Tanah Abang Market, the largest textile market in Indonesia and one of Jakarta's oldest, dating back to 1735. Textiles have been the driving force behind the remarkable growth of the Tanah Abang Market. This research aims to delve deeper into the significance of Tanah Abang Market beyond its economic role. Through archival study and observations, it seeks to unveil the market’s evolution, shedding light on the dynamics behind its architectural transformation over nearly three centuries, from its colonial-era inception to the post-colonial era. By examining its long-standing presence, the research identified three pivotal periods in the market's journey: the urban revolution, the era of industrialization, and a wave of cultural change. Much like a woven fabric, the market comprises overlapping threads, each exerting its unique influence. Throughout its history, Tanah Abang Market has not only stitched and colored the city of Jakarta, but its reach extends across various regions of Indonesia, contributing to the socio-cultural texture at large.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7
JournalCity, Territory and Architecture
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Architecture
  • Colonial-postcolonial
  • Tanah Abang Market
  • Textiles
  • Textures

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Textile and texture in Tanah Abang Market: architectural evolution from the colonial to the post-colonial era'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this