TY - JOUR
T1 - Success rate of laryngeal mask insertion by medical students
T2 - Comparison between routine teaching method and four-stage teaching method
AU - Ramlan, Andi Ade Wijaya
AU - Firdaus, Riyadh
AU - Amarullah, Muhammad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Scientific Publishers. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - Introduction: Airway management is one of the priorities during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Laryngeal mask (LM) served as an alternative airway management with high success rate. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, performed regular teaching method as well as the four-stage teaching method. This study compared the results of teaching LM insertion for medical students between those who received four-stage teaching method and regular teaching in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial of 43 students in the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care. After the materials were given, every subject inserted LM in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia. The inclusion criteria were students who agreed to be research subjects, were willing to cooperate, followed research algorithm, had not received any training on LM insertion and had not done LM insertion to both mannequin and human. The success of the teaching was assessed by chest rising when ventilated, a number of attempts, and seal pressure. This research has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia. Result: In both groups the study found 100% chest rising when ventilated. The group with four-stage teaching method required less number of attempts (p = 0.001) and generated higher seal pressure than the other group (25 cm H2O vs. 22 cm H2O, p = 0.018). Four-stage teaching method required less time for LM insertion (22 seconds vs. 50.5 seconds, p = 0.019). Conclusion: The result of the teaching LM insertion by medical students who get the four stage teaching method was better than the regular teaching method.
AB - Introduction: Airway management is one of the priorities during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Laryngeal mask (LM) served as an alternative airway management with high success rate. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, performed regular teaching method as well as the four-stage teaching method. This study compared the results of teaching LM insertion for medical students between those who received four-stage teaching method and regular teaching in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial of 43 students in the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care. After the materials were given, every subject inserted LM in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia. The inclusion criteria were students who agreed to be research subjects, were willing to cooperate, followed research algorithm, had not received any training on LM insertion and had not done LM insertion to both mannequin and human. The success of the teaching was assessed by chest rising when ventilated, a number of attempts, and seal pressure. This research has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia. Result: In both groups the study found 100% chest rising when ventilated. The group with four-stage teaching method required less number of attempts (p = 0.001) and generated higher seal pressure than the other group (25 cm H2O vs. 22 cm H2O, p = 0.018). Four-stage teaching method required less time for LM insertion (22 seconds vs. 50.5 seconds, p = 0.019). Conclusion: The result of the teaching LM insertion by medical students who get the four stage teaching method was better than the regular teaching method.
KW - Airway management
KW - Laryngeal mask
KW - Medical students
KW - Teaching method
KW - The result of teaching
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030260711&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1166/asl.2017.9401
DO - 10.1166/asl.2017.9401
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85030260711
SN - 1936-6612
VL - 23
SP - 6800
EP - 6802
JO - Advanced Science Letters
JF - Advanced Science Letters
IS - 7
ER -