TY - JOUR
T1 - Strengthening of causality assessment of adverse events following immunization in the WHO South East Asia and Western Pacific regions
T2 - Lessons from the 2014 SEAR inter-country workshop
AU - 2014 Inter-country SEAR Workshop Participants
AU - MacDonald, Noni E.
AU - Guichard, Stephane
AU - Amarasinghe, Ananda
AU - Balakrishnan, Madhava Ram
AU - Rahman, Shafiqur
AU - Islam, Shafiqul
AU - Barami, Salim A.A.
AU - Tamang, Tshewang Dorji
AU - Khera, Ajay
AU - Jain, Sujeet Kumar
AU - Satari, Hingky Hindra Irawan
AU - Handari, Rahma Dewi
AU - Karolina, Sherli
AU - Latheef, Aishath Thimna
AU - Adhikari, Neelam
AU - Upreti, Shyam Raj
AU - Gurung, Santosh
AU - Dissanayake, Sriyani
AU - Samarasinghe, Duminda
AU - Nimmanitya, Suchitra
AU - Yoocharoen, Pornsak
AU - Thiparat, Kanoktip
AU - Pokhagul, Pattreya
AU - Jivapaisarnpong, Teeranart
AU - Thanaphollert, Prapassorn
AU - Varinsathien, Porpit
AU - Varela, Lilianados Santos
AU - Huong, Nguyen Lien
AU - Hanh, Nguyen Thi My
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015.
PY - 2015/11/27
Y1 - 2015/11/27
N2 - Background: Poorly managed AEFI undermine immunization programs. Improved surveillance in SEAR countries means more AEFIs but management varies. SEAR brought countries together to share AEFI experiences, and learn more about causality assessment. Methods: Three day 10 country workshop (9 SEAR; 1 WPR). Participants outlined county AEFI experiences, undertook causality assessment for 8 AEFIs using WHO methodology, critiqued the process by questionnaire and had a discussion. Results: All 10 valued AEFI monitoring and causality assessment, and praised the opportunity to share experiences. Participants determined a range of AEFI and causality assessment needs in SEAR such as adapting WHO Algorithm, CIOMS/Brighton definitions, WHO verbal autopsy to fit context, requesting a practical guide - AEFI definition, time interval, rates of AEFI for different vaccines and evidence for vaccine related causes of death under 24. h. Conclusions: LMIC need WHO AEFI tools adapted to better fit LMIC. Learning from each other builds capacity. Sharing AEFI experiences, case reviews help LMIC improve practices.
AB - Background: Poorly managed AEFI undermine immunization programs. Improved surveillance in SEAR countries means more AEFIs but management varies. SEAR brought countries together to share AEFI experiences, and learn more about causality assessment. Methods: Three day 10 country workshop (9 SEAR; 1 WPR). Participants outlined county AEFI experiences, undertook causality assessment for 8 AEFIs using WHO methodology, critiqued the process by questionnaire and had a discussion. Results: All 10 valued AEFI monitoring and causality assessment, and praised the opportunity to share experiences. Participants determined a range of AEFI and causality assessment needs in SEAR such as adapting WHO Algorithm, CIOMS/Brighton definitions, WHO verbal autopsy to fit context, requesting a practical guide - AEFI definition, time interval, rates of AEFI for different vaccines and evidence for vaccine related causes of death under 24. h. Conclusions: LMIC need WHO AEFI tools adapted to better fit LMIC. Learning from each other builds capacity. Sharing AEFI experiences, case reviews help LMIC improve practices.
KW - AEFI
KW - Adverse events following immunization
KW - Causality assessment
KW - South East Asia Region
KW - World Health Organization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951567998&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.033
DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.033
M3 - Article
C2 - 25617790
AN - SCOPUS:84951567998
SN - 0264-410X
VL - 33
SP - 6902
EP - 6907
JO - Vaccine
JF - Vaccine
IS - 48
ER -