TY - JOUR
T1 - Smoke-free zone in indonesia
T2 - Who is doing what now
AU - Sulistiadi, Wahyu
AU - Veruswati, Meita
AU - Asyary, Al
AU - Herawati, Maria Holly
AU - Wulandari, Ririn Arminsih
AU - Haryanto, Budi
N1 - Funding Information:
Edited by: Mirko Spiroski Citation: Sulistiadi W, Veruswati M, Asyary A, Herawati MH, Wulandari RA, Haryanto B. Smoke-free Zone in Indonesia: Who is Doing What Now. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2020 May 25; 8(E):322-324. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.4091 Keywords:Tobacco use; Government regulation; Social control policies; Environmental health *Correspondence: Dr. Al Asyary, Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, C Building 2nd Floor, Campus FKM-UI, Depok 16424, Indonesia. Phone/Fax: +62-21-7863479. E-mail: [email protected] Received: 22-Nov-2019 Revised: 14-Apr-2020 Accepted: 14-Apr-2020 Copyright: © 2020 Wahyu Sulistiadi, Meita Veruswati, Al Asyary, Maria Holly Herawati, Ririn Arminsih Wulandari, Budi Haryanto Funding: This research was supported by Sub Directorate for Research and Development, Directorate for Research and Community Engagement, Universitas Indonesia (Risbang DRPM-UI). Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist Open Access: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wahyu Sulistiadi, Meita Veruswati, Al Asyary, Maria Holly Herawati, Ririn Arminsih Wulandari, Budi Haryanto.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - BACKGROUND: Although all environments whom applied smoke-free zones (SFZs) have sufficient compliance rate (over 80%) in Indonesia particularly in Bogor City, it is still unclear who is doing what now on SFZs activities to assess the effectivity and efficiency of this tobacco control program. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to present the evidence of tobacco control on SFZs programs and activities of these zones based on the several indicators set by the local government’s regulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review was held to observe the SFZs local regulation archives. Data were derived from secondary sources and observation data of law enforcement teams’ generic activities and programs in Bogor City in the Province of Jawa Barat, Indonesia. RESULTS: There were eight (eight) zones designated as SFZs according to the local regulation, namely: (1) Public places, (2) workplaces, (3) places of worship, (4) children’s playgrounds and/or other gathering places, (5) public transportation, (6) teaching and learning environments, (7) health facilities, and (8) sports facilities. It resulted that 55% of these zones still uncomplied to SFZs regulation. It is still a tobacco control homework in Indonesia while it is remembering that Indonesia has the only largest country of six developing countries that have not ratified Framework Convention on Tobacco Control of the World Health Organization. CONCLUSION: The role of the SFZs’ enforcement team is crucial and consists of relevant stakeholders to optimize activities and programs of SFZs regulations with clear targeting, rewards, and punishments. However, further studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of non-smoking areas specifically.
AB - BACKGROUND: Although all environments whom applied smoke-free zones (SFZs) have sufficient compliance rate (over 80%) in Indonesia particularly in Bogor City, it is still unclear who is doing what now on SFZs activities to assess the effectivity and efficiency of this tobacco control program. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to present the evidence of tobacco control on SFZs programs and activities of these zones based on the several indicators set by the local government’s regulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review was held to observe the SFZs local regulation archives. Data were derived from secondary sources and observation data of law enforcement teams’ generic activities and programs in Bogor City in the Province of Jawa Barat, Indonesia. RESULTS: There were eight (eight) zones designated as SFZs according to the local regulation, namely: (1) Public places, (2) workplaces, (3) places of worship, (4) children’s playgrounds and/or other gathering places, (5) public transportation, (6) teaching and learning environments, (7) health facilities, and (8) sports facilities. It resulted that 55% of these zones still uncomplied to SFZs regulation. It is still a tobacco control homework in Indonesia while it is remembering that Indonesia has the only largest country of six developing countries that have not ratified Framework Convention on Tobacco Control of the World Health Organization. CONCLUSION: The role of the SFZs’ enforcement team is crucial and consists of relevant stakeholders to optimize activities and programs of SFZs regulations with clear targeting, rewards, and punishments. However, further studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of non-smoking areas specifically.
KW - Environmental health
KW - Government regulation
KW - Social control policies
KW - Tobacco use
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091367014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3889/oamjms.2020.4091
DO - 10.3889/oamjms.2020.4091
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85091367014
SN - 1857-5749
VL - 8
SP - 322
EP - 324
JO - Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences
JF - Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences
IS - E
ER -