TY - JOUR
T1 - Salivary profile of recovering illicit drug addicts in rehabilitation center of the national narcotics board
AU - Sasanti, Harum
AU - Ramadian, Ellis Eka
AU - Permana, Gus
AU - Pradono, Siti Aliyah
AU - Wimardhani, Yuniardini Septorini
AU - Kusuma, Yuniarosa Widya
AU - Soetojo, Afi Savitri
AU - Soegyanto, Anandina Irmagita
AU - Rahmayanti, Febrina
AU - Wardhany, Indriasti Indah
AU - Baringbing, Anzany Tania Dwi Putri
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, University of Dicle.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Drug abuse may cause some changes to the oral cavity, such as hyposalivation, alteration in salivary pH, and buffering capacity, which may lead to other oral problems. The purpose of this study is to determine the salivary flow rate (SFR), pH, and buffering capacity in recovering drug addicts. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 86 residents from the Hope and Re-entry groups of the rehabilitation centre. The samples used were stimulated (SS) and unstimulated (US) saliva. Saliva was collected using the spitting method for a period of five minutes. Participants chewed paraffin wax prior to the collection of SS samples. SS was analysed for buffer capacity, and US was analysed for pH. The mean values for the Hope and re-entry groups respectively were USFR (ml/min) 0.41 ± 0.17 and 0.45 ± 0.2; SSFR (ml/min) 1.39±0.59 and 1.21 ± 0.59; unstimulated pH 6.86 ± 0.4 and 6.9 ± 0.4; stimulated pH 7.4 ± 0.3 and 7.3 ± 0.3; and buffer capacity 6.8 ± 2.8 and 6.38 ± 2.7. Salivary buffering capacity, which was lower in the Re-entry group, might be related to SSFR, as salivary buffering capacity increased as the SFR increased, and vice versa. A history of illicit drug use did not affect SFR or pH, since both groups had normal SFR and salivary pH. However, it may have affected salivary buffering capacity, as suggested by relatively low buffering capacity in both groups.
AB - Drug abuse may cause some changes to the oral cavity, such as hyposalivation, alteration in salivary pH, and buffering capacity, which may lead to other oral problems. The purpose of this study is to determine the salivary flow rate (SFR), pH, and buffering capacity in recovering drug addicts. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 86 residents from the Hope and Re-entry groups of the rehabilitation centre. The samples used were stimulated (SS) and unstimulated (US) saliva. Saliva was collected using the spitting method for a period of five minutes. Participants chewed paraffin wax prior to the collection of SS samples. SS was analysed for buffer capacity, and US was analysed for pH. The mean values for the Hope and re-entry groups respectively were USFR (ml/min) 0.41 ± 0.17 and 0.45 ± 0.2; SSFR (ml/min) 1.39±0.59 and 1.21 ± 0.59; unstimulated pH 6.86 ± 0.4 and 6.9 ± 0.4; stimulated pH 7.4 ± 0.3 and 7.3 ± 0.3; and buffer capacity 6.8 ± 2.8 and 6.38 ± 2.7. Salivary buffering capacity, which was lower in the Re-entry group, might be related to SSFR, as salivary buffering capacity increased as the SFR increased, and vice versa. A history of illicit drug use did not affect SFR or pH, since both groups had normal SFR and salivary pH. However, it may have affected salivary buffering capacity, as suggested by relatively low buffering capacity in both groups.
KW - Recovering drugs user
KW - Salivary profile
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050217647&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85050217647
SN - 1309-100X
VL - 10
SP - 555
EP - 558
JO - Journal of International Dental and Medical Research
JF - Journal of International Dental and Medical Research
IS - Specialissue
ER -