TY - JOUR
T1 - Salivary nitric oxide, Simplified Oral Hygiene Index, and salivary flow rate in smokers and non-smokers
T2 - A cross-sectional study
AU - Bachtiar, Endang Winiati
AU - Putri, Atikah Cyntia
AU - Bachtiar, Boy Muchlis
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Bachtiar EW et al.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - Background: Salivary nitric oxide plays an important role as an antibacterial agent in the oral cavity. Here, we analyze salivary nitric oxide, Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) scores and the salivary flow rate in smokers and non-smokers which has not been done previously. Methods: A cross sectional study included 25 smokers and 25 non-smokers. Their OHI-S results were categorized as 'good,' 'medium,' or 'bad.' Unstimulated saliva samples were collected, and their nitric oxide concentration was measured using the Griess method. Results: The salivary flow rate in smokers was lower, at 0.30 ml/minute, compared to non-smokers who had a salivary flow rate of 0.33 ml/minute. This was statistically insignificant. There was a significant difference in the concentrations of nitric oxide between smokers and non-smokers (p < 0.05). Smokers had higher concentrations than non-smokers (185.4 M Vs 114.60 M). In addition, there was a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.305) between the concentration of salivary nitric oxide level and the OHI-S results. Conclusions: It was concluded that salivary nitric oxide concentration was higher in smokers, and the oral hygiene condition of smokers was poor.
AB - Background: Salivary nitric oxide plays an important role as an antibacterial agent in the oral cavity. Here, we analyze salivary nitric oxide, Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) scores and the salivary flow rate in smokers and non-smokers which has not been done previously. Methods: A cross sectional study included 25 smokers and 25 non-smokers. Their OHI-S results were categorized as 'good,' 'medium,' or 'bad.' Unstimulated saliva samples were collected, and their nitric oxide concentration was measured using the Griess method. Results: The salivary flow rate in smokers was lower, at 0.30 ml/minute, compared to non-smokers who had a salivary flow rate of 0.33 ml/minute. This was statistically insignificant. There was a significant difference in the concentrations of nitric oxide between smokers and non-smokers (p < 0.05). Smokers had higher concentrations than non-smokers (185.4 M Vs 114.60 M). In addition, there was a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.305) between the concentration of salivary nitric oxide level and the OHI-S results. Conclusions: It was concluded that salivary nitric oxide concentration was higher in smokers, and the oral hygiene condition of smokers was poor.
KW - Griess Method
KW - Oral Hygiene Index
KW - Salivary Flow Rate
KW - Salivary Nitric Oxide
KW - Smoker
KW - Whole Saliva
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083171345&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.12688/f1000research.20099.2
DO - 10.12688/f1000research.20099.2
M3 - Article
C2 - 32269757
AN - SCOPUS:85083171345
SN - 2046-1402
VL - 8
JO - F1000Research
JF - F1000Research
M1 - 1744
ER -