TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety of clean urologic operations without prophylaxis antibiotic therapy in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
T2 - A double-blind randomized controlled trial study
AU - Wahyudi, Irfan
AU - Birowo, Ponco
AU - Sanjaya, I. Putu Gde
AU - Fawzi, Rizky
AU - Rasyid, Nur
AU - Mochtar, Chaidir A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015, Asian Surgical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/10/1
Y1 - 2015/10/1
N2 - Objective This study was conducted to identify the safety measures of performing clean urologic operations without administration of prophylaxis antibiotics. Methods We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial with patients who underwent clean urologic operations in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, from April 2013 to January 2014. The local and systemic infection states were compared between the prophylaxis and placebo groups. Local infection was identified as surgical site infection and systemic infection as fever and leukocytosis. Results A total of 42 patients participated in the study (21 patients in each group), comprising 14 (33.3%) children and 28 (66.7%) adults. The most frequently performed operation was surgical sperm retrieval. No patients in either group were found to have local or systemic infection. However, there was a statistical difference in the white blood cell counts between the two groups (p = 0.003), although there was no sign of local or systemic infection in any of the patients. Conclusion Clean urologic operations without prophylaxis antibiotic therapy can be safely applied to urologic patients.
AB - Objective This study was conducted to identify the safety measures of performing clean urologic operations without administration of prophylaxis antibiotics. Methods We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial with patients who underwent clean urologic operations in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, from April 2013 to January 2014. The local and systemic infection states were compared between the prophylaxis and placebo groups. Local infection was identified as surgical site infection and systemic infection as fever and leukocytosis. Results A total of 42 patients participated in the study (21 patients in each group), comprising 14 (33.3%) children and 28 (66.7%) adults. The most frequently performed operation was surgical sperm retrieval. No patients in either group were found to have local or systemic infection. However, there was a statistical difference in the white blood cell counts between the two groups (p = 0.003), although there was no sign of local or systemic infection in any of the patients. Conclusion Clean urologic operations without prophylaxis antibiotic therapy can be safely applied to urologic patients.
KW - clean urologic operation
KW - local and systemic infection postoperation
KW - prophylaxis antibiotics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942079481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.03.004
DO - 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.03.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 25957214
AN - SCOPUS:84942079481
SN - 1015-9584
VL - 38
SP - 224
EP - 228
JO - Asian Journal of Surgery
JF - Asian Journal of Surgery
IS - 4
ER -