TY - GEN
T1 - Risk Identification and Response for Deep Foundation Works
T2 - 8th International Conference on Engineering, Technology, and Industrial Applications 2021, ICETIA 2021
AU - Bayuadi, Yohanes Pembaptis Budi
AU - Riantini, Leni Sagita
AU - Isvara, Wisnu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Institute of Physics Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/2/23
Y1 - 2024/2/23
N2 - In carrying out the work of bored pile and secant pile, it was often faced risks, which can result in increased construction delay if it occurs. Risks in the execution of bored and secant piles often arise due to invisible dangers in the ground. Therefore, risk identification and response are required. This research aims to identify risks and analyze impacts that build the risk responses. Qualitative methods using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) are used in this research. The dominant risk factor factors und concrete does not meet specifications, limited road access to the project site, lack of coordination with the surrounding community, wrong method statement, and the accuracy of the surveyor team. Therefore, the risk response is replacing the concrete according to the requirement, managing the access and schedule for transportation, especially equipment and materials to the project site, community engagement, evaluating and determining the more appropriate method, and estimating re-calculating design. Execution guidelines based on risk are expected to be used by specialist contractors to minimize the negative impact on the construction of bored pile and secant pile works.
AB - In carrying out the work of bored pile and secant pile, it was often faced risks, which can result in increased construction delay if it occurs. Risks in the execution of bored and secant piles often arise due to invisible dangers in the ground. Therefore, risk identification and response are required. This research aims to identify risks and analyze impacts that build the risk responses. Qualitative methods using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) are used in this research. The dominant risk factor factors und concrete does not meet specifications, limited road access to the project site, lack of coordination with the surrounding community, wrong method statement, and the accuracy of the surveyor team. Therefore, the risk response is replacing the concrete according to the requirement, managing the access and schedule for transportation, especially equipment and materials to the project site, community engagement, evaluating and determining the more appropriate method, and estimating re-calculating design. Execution guidelines based on risk are expected to be used by specialist contractors to minimize the negative impact on the construction of bored pile and secant pile works.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187572129&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/5.0189359
DO - 10.1063/5.0189359
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85187572129
T3 - AIP Conference Proceedings
BT - AIP Conference Proceedings
A2 - Setiawan, Wisnu
A2 - Anggono, Agus Dwi
A2 - Hidayati, Nurul
A2 - Kusban, Muhammad
PB - American Institute of Physics
Y2 - 15 December 2021 through 16 December 2021
ER -