Restrictive versus liberal fluid bolus therapy in septic shock children: An evidence-based case report

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Fluid bolus therapy (FBT) is one of prime management in early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) to achieve adequate cardiac output. The Fluid Expansion as Supportive Therapy (FEAST) tri-al, a randomized-clinical trial that was used as an evidence to support fluid resuscitation rec-ommendation in Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) 2020, must be discontinued because of . increasing mortality in the group that received higher volume of FBT. We present a case of a 9-year-old girl, 15 kg, came to emergency ward with refractory septic shock and became fluid overload after the second FBT. This proceeding aimed to deliver evidence-based case practice if the comparison between liberal versus restrictive FBT in children with septic shock.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-152
Number of pages10
JournalCritical Care and Shock
Volume24
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Keywords

  • Fluid
  • Liberal
  • Pediatric
  • Restrictive
  • Resuscitation
  • Shock

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Restrictive versus liberal fluid bolus therapy in septic shock children: An evidence-based case report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this