Dental crowns or bridges can occasionally come loose or separate from the tooth during chewing, particularly when they are situated on small, short, and conical teeth. The main cause of this separation is a lack of retention and resistance to the tooth. There are several methods available to increase the retention and resistance of the crown during both inlay and onlay preparation, including parallelism, groove preparation, crown build-up, and surface roughness. The aim of this study was to determine the differences in resistance of full veneer metal crowns with various forms of groove preparation. The study involved the compressive strength testing of a total of 24 specimens, namely six specimens without groove preparation, six specimens with box-shaped grooves, six specimens with V-shaped grooves, and six specimens with half round grooves. The mean values of the metal crowns that separated from the teeth during testing were 27.97 ± 1.08 kgF for the crowns with box-shaped grooves, 6.15 ± 0.22 kgF for those with V-shaped grooves, 1.77 ± 0.12 kgF for those with half round grooves, and 0.95 ± 0.13 kgF for those without grooves. This study found that the resistance is best in crowns with box-shaped grooves, followed by those with V-shaped grooves, half round grooves, and those without groove. When clinicians are working on short and conical molar teeth, it is therefore recommended that box-shaped grooves are used to increase the resistance of the crown.
|Journal of Physics: Conference Series
|Published - 30 Aug 2017
|1st Physics and Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry Symposium, PTMDS 2017 - Depok, West Java, Indonesia
Duration: 15 Jul 2017 → 16 Jul 2017