Reply to "comment on 'Nonidentical protons' " COMMENTS COMMENTS

Terry Mart; Anto Sulaksono

doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.039802

Reply to "comment on 'Nonidentical protons' " COMMENTS COMMENTS

Terry Mart, Anto Sulaksono

Department of Physics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We reply to the Comment by Arrington, which concerns the proton radius extracted from the elastic electron-proton scattering data by using the assumption of nonidentical protons. We agree that the extracted radius should be 0.853 fm. We briefly point out the corresponding consequence in the result of our original paper.

Original language	English
Article number	039802
Journal	Physical Review C
Volume	93
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.039802
Publication status	Published - 29 Mar 2016

Access to Document

10.1103/PhysRevC.93.039802

Cite this

@article{485736484e994062a899174b7609bc85,

title = "Reply to {"}comment on 'Nonidentical protons' {"} COMMENTS COMMENTS",

abstract = "We reply to the Comment by Arrington, which concerns the proton radius extracted from the elastic electron-proton scattering data by using the assumption of nonidentical protons. We agree that the extracted radius should be 0.853 fm. We briefly point out the corresponding consequence in the result of our original paper.",

author = "Terry Mart and Anto Sulaksono",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 American Physical Society.",

year = "2016",

month = mar,

day = "29",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevC.93.039802",

language = "English",

volume = "93",

journal = "Physical Review C",

issn = "2469-9985",

publisher = "American Physical Society",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to "comment on 'Nonidentical protons' " COMMENTS COMMENTS

AU - Mart, Terry

AU - Sulaksono, Anto

PY - 2016/3/29

Y1 - 2016/3/29

N2 - We reply to the Comment by Arrington, which concerns the proton radius extracted from the elastic electron-proton scattering data by using the assumption of nonidentical protons. We agree that the extracted radius should be 0.853 fm. We briefly point out the corresponding consequence in the result of our original paper.

AB - We reply to the Comment by Arrington, which concerns the proton radius extracted from the elastic electron-proton scattering data by using the assumption of nonidentical protons. We agree that the extracted radius should be 0.853 fm. We briefly point out the corresponding consequence in the result of our original paper.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963657088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.039802

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.039802

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84963657088

VL - 93

JO - Physical Review C

JF - Physical Review C

SN - 2469-9985

IS - 3

M1 - 039802

ER -

Reply to "comment on 'Nonidentical protons' " COMMENTS COMMENTS

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this