Reframing Integration for Mixed Methods Research

Timothy Lynam; Rita Damayanti; Christiana Rialine Titaley; Nugroho Suharno; Mark Bradley; Alison Krentel

doi:10.1177/1558689819879352

Reframing Integration for Mixed Methods Research

Timothy Lynam, Rita Damayanti, Christiana Rialine Titaley, Nugroho Suharno, Mark Bradley, Alison Krentel

Department of Health Education and Behavioral Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We suggest and illustrate from our experiences of integration in a public health context in Indonesia, a reframing of integration for mixed methods research that focuses on context, outcomes, objects, and integrative mechanisms. Through describing the tools and conceptualizations that helped us integrate, we argue for expanding the scope of integration to include social process methods (which we describe) and for rethinking the desired outcomes of integration. The article contributes to the field of mixed methods research by proposing: (a) a new framing of integration that supports greater precision as well as an expanded scope over what and how integration could be implemented, (b) a set of theoretical and conceptual models to support integration, and (c) a new and fully integrated data collection instrument.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	336-357
Number of pages	22
Journal	Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Volume	14
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819879352
Publication status	Accepted/In press - 1 Jan 2019

Keywords

cognitive integration
integration
integrative mechanisms
mass drug administration
social outcomes
social representations

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1177/1558689819879352

Cite this

@article{8a787ac2b0924973a1252369b69f7c95,

title = "Reframing Integration for Mixed Methods Research",

abstract = "We suggest and illustrate from our experiences of integration in a public health context in Indonesia, a reframing of integration for mixed methods research that focuses on context, outcomes, objects, and integrative mechanisms. Through describing the tools and conceptualizations that helped us integrate, we argue for expanding the scope of integration to include social process methods (which we describe) and for rethinking the desired outcomes of integration. The article contributes to the field of mixed methods research by proposing: (a) a new framing of integration that supports greater precision as well as an expanded scope over what and how integration could be implemented, (b) a set of theoretical and conceptual models to support integration, and (c) a new and fully integrated data collection instrument.",

keywords = "cognitive integration, integration, integrative mechanisms, mass drug administration, social outcomes, social representations",

author = "Timothy Lynam and Rita Damayanti and {Rialine Titaley}, Christiana and Nugroho Suharno and Mark Bradley and Alison Krentel",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2019.",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/1558689819879352",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "336--357",

journal = "Journal of Mixed Methods Research",

issn = "1558-6898",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reframing Integration for Mixed Methods Research

AU - Lynam, Timothy

AU - Damayanti, Rita

AU - Rialine Titaley, Christiana

AU - Suharno, Nugroho

AU - Bradley, Mark

AU - Krentel, Alison

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2019.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - We suggest and illustrate from our experiences of integration in a public health context in Indonesia, a reframing of integration for mixed methods research that focuses on context, outcomes, objects, and integrative mechanisms. Through describing the tools and conceptualizations that helped us integrate, we argue for expanding the scope of integration to include social process methods (which we describe) and for rethinking the desired outcomes of integration. The article contributes to the field of mixed methods research by proposing: (a) a new framing of integration that supports greater precision as well as an expanded scope over what and how integration could be implemented, (b) a set of theoretical and conceptual models to support integration, and (c) a new and fully integrated data collection instrument.

AB - We suggest and illustrate from our experiences of integration in a public health context in Indonesia, a reframing of integration for mixed methods research that focuses on context, outcomes, objects, and integrative mechanisms. Through describing the tools and conceptualizations that helped us integrate, we argue for expanding the scope of integration to include social process methods (which we describe) and for rethinking the desired outcomes of integration. The article contributes to the field of mixed methods research by proposing: (a) a new framing of integration that supports greater precision as well as an expanded scope over what and how integration could be implemented, (b) a set of theoretical and conceptual models to support integration, and (c) a new and fully integrated data collection instrument.

KW - cognitive integration

KW - integration

KW - integrative mechanisms

KW - mass drug administration

KW - social outcomes

KW - social representations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074556879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1558689819879352

DO - 10.1177/1558689819879352

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074556879

SN - 1558-6898

VL - 14

SP - 336

EP - 357

JO - Journal of Mixed Methods Research

JF - Journal of Mixed Methods Research

IS - 3

ER -

Reframing Integration for Mixed Methods Research

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this