TY - GEN
T1 - Recent advances in 3D printed wound dressings
AU - Nadhif, Muhammad Hanif
AU - Assyarify, Hanif
AU - Irsyad, Muhammad
AU - Pramesti, Arindha R.
AU - Suhaeri, Muhammad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Author(s).
PY - 2021/3/23
Y1 - 2021/3/23
N2 - Chronic and acute wounds interfere with personal aesthetics and appearance. Regarding the problematics, researchers enhance the functionalities of wound dressings. One of the enhancement approaches is using 3D printing technology. The use of 3D printing has enabled many types of wound dressings, including biodegradable multi-material, cell-laden, and drug-eluting wound dressings. The use of 3D printing even allows for a wound dressing with a 3D construct, facilitating the wound dressing placement at the wound bed. Unfortunately, the 3D printed wound dressing technology has never been reviewed, to the extent of our knowledge. In this report, we aim to reflect on the recent advances in 3D printed wound dressings. Reports regarding the 3D printed wound dressing were collected from the Google Scholar database. The search was limited from 2015 to 2020 with a logic search: "3D printed"AND "wound dressing,"which words can be found in the entire article. Irrelevant reports were excluded manually, thereby resulting in the 24 selected articles. The selected articles were subsequently reviewed in terms of the materials-efficacy analysis and 3D printing mechanism. The extracted information from all articles concluded that alginate is the most used material for 3D printed wound dressing, while the most used 3D printing mechanism is the pneumatic FDM. In terms of efficacy, wound dressings presented an antimicrobial performance against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as biocompatibility to epidermis and dermis cells.
AB - Chronic and acute wounds interfere with personal aesthetics and appearance. Regarding the problematics, researchers enhance the functionalities of wound dressings. One of the enhancement approaches is using 3D printing technology. The use of 3D printing has enabled many types of wound dressings, including biodegradable multi-material, cell-laden, and drug-eluting wound dressings. The use of 3D printing even allows for a wound dressing with a 3D construct, facilitating the wound dressing placement at the wound bed. Unfortunately, the 3D printed wound dressing technology has never been reviewed, to the extent of our knowledge. In this report, we aim to reflect on the recent advances in 3D printed wound dressings. Reports regarding the 3D printed wound dressing were collected from the Google Scholar database. The search was limited from 2015 to 2020 with a logic search: "3D printed"AND "wound dressing,"which words can be found in the entire article. Irrelevant reports were excluded manually, thereby resulting in the 24 selected articles. The selected articles were subsequently reviewed in terms of the materials-efficacy analysis and 3D printing mechanism. The extracted information from all articles concluded that alginate is the most used material for 3D printed wound dressing, while the most used 3D printing mechanism is the pneumatic FDM. In terms of efficacy, wound dressings presented an antimicrobial performance against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as biocompatibility to epidermis and dermis cells.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103522380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/5.0047183
DO - 10.1063/5.0047183
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85103522380
T3 - AIP Conference Proceedings
BT - 5th Biomedical Engineering''s Recent Progress in Biomaterials, Drugs Development, and Medical Devices
A2 - Lischer, Kenny
A2 - Supriadi, Sugeng
A2 - Rahman, Siti Fauziyah
A2 - Whulanza, Yudan
PB - American Institute of Physics Inc.
T2 - 5th International Symposium of Biomedical Engineering, ISBE 2020
Y2 - 28 July 2020 through 29 July 2020
ER -