TY - GEN
T1 - Public Green Space Planning and Management towards Livable City
AU - Santosa, Budi Heru
AU - Koestoer, Raldi Hendro
N1 - Funding Information:
ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Research and Technology/National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) for providing the SAINTEK scholarship to support this research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IEEE.
PY - 2020/12/7
Y1 - 2020/12/7
N2 - Urban public green spaces (PGS), with their ecological, health support, and social functions needed by the community, would grow in terms of absolute number and spatial distributed populations. However, PGS's volume and spatial areas did not expand linearly to population growth; even in some cases, there has even been a decrease in volume and area for PGS. This paper examines PGS's planning process and management, which faces problems due to the population growth that requires more settlement areas and other socioeconomic facilities. The methodology applied was a comparative study in planning and managing PGS for two cases, Munich and the Yogyakarta municipal areas, which regionally have similar characteristics. The result shows that both regions tend to have proper governance for PGS. Also, both regions tend to have similar urban spatial structures associated with distributed growth centers of the polycentric system and address similar problems related to population growth. Despite the facts, both have differences in community perception of livable city function, especially for community cultural and social-relational aspects. In conclusion, this paper has highlighted that PGS's comprehensive planning is indispensable to achieve ecological, health support, and social functions to attain a livable city; therefore, a dynamic spatial model that considers variables: housing demand, urban spatial structure, urban growth form, and also community participation, could be a useful detecting tool to measure the level of development.
AB - Urban public green spaces (PGS), with their ecological, health support, and social functions needed by the community, would grow in terms of absolute number and spatial distributed populations. However, PGS's volume and spatial areas did not expand linearly to population growth; even in some cases, there has even been a decrease in volume and area for PGS. This paper examines PGS's planning process and management, which faces problems due to the population growth that requires more settlement areas and other socioeconomic facilities. The methodology applied was a comparative study in planning and managing PGS for two cases, Munich and the Yogyakarta municipal areas, which regionally have similar characteristics. The result shows that both regions tend to have proper governance for PGS. Also, both regions tend to have similar urban spatial structures associated with distributed growth centers of the polycentric system and address similar problems related to population growth. Despite the facts, both have differences in community perception of livable city function, especially for community cultural and social-relational aspects. In conclusion, this paper has highlighted that PGS's comprehensive planning is indispensable to achieve ecological, health support, and social functions to attain a livable city; therefore, a dynamic spatial model that considers variables: housing demand, urban spatial structure, urban growth form, and also community participation, could be a useful detecting tool to measure the level of development.
KW - green space
KW - growth center
KW - livable city
KW - population growth
KW - public green space development
KW - urban planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113399635&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/AGERS51788.2020.9452765
DO - 10.1109/AGERS51788.2020.9452765
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85113399635
T3 - Proceeding - AGERS 2020: IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Geoscience, Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology: Understanding the Interaction of Land, Ocean and Atmosphere: Disaster Mitigation and Regional Resillience
SP - 102
EP - 106
BT - Proceeding - AGERS 2020
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 3rd IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Geoscience, Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology, AGERS 2020
Y2 - 7 December 2020 through 8 December 2020
ER -
