TY - GEN
T1 - Proxy-based losses and pair-based losses for face image retrieval
AU - Ramadiansyah, Muhammad
AU - Rahadianti, Laksmita
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Univereitas Indonesia, for funding through Hibah Publikasi Terindeks Intemasional (PUTT) Presiding No. NKB-869/UN2.RS17HKP.05.00/2020.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IEEE.
PY - 2020/10/17
Y1 - 2020/10/17
N2 - Distance metric learning has been considered an effective strategy to represent data in computer vision problems such as image retrieval and face verification. Metric learning attempts to minimize a loss function in order to transform data into a more optimal representation for further applications. In this paper, we compare 4 different types of loss functions, e.g. 2 pair-based losses (Contrastive loss and Triplet Margin Ranking loss), and 2 proxy-based losses (Proxy-NCA loss and Proxy-Anchor loss) in a multi-class classification task. Our experiments show that the Proxy-Anchor loss could achieve 70.8% accuracy on average compared to the Proxy-NCA loss, Triplet Margin Ranking loss and Contrastive loss which could only achieve 65.5%, 62.2%, and 36.6% respectively. Furthermore, we also present the qualitative results using high dimensional plot visualization in order to evaluate data distribution and sample image retrieval results. Overall, the Proxy-Anchor loss performs better than the other losses in terms of accuracy, recall, data separation, and image retrieval.
AB - Distance metric learning has been considered an effective strategy to represent data in computer vision problems such as image retrieval and face verification. Metric learning attempts to minimize a loss function in order to transform data into a more optimal representation for further applications. In this paper, we compare 4 different types of loss functions, e.g. 2 pair-based losses (Contrastive loss and Triplet Margin Ranking loss), and 2 proxy-based losses (Proxy-NCA loss and Proxy-Anchor loss) in a multi-class classification task. Our experiments show that the Proxy-Anchor loss could achieve 70.8% accuracy on average compared to the Proxy-NCA loss, Triplet Margin Ranking loss and Contrastive loss which could only achieve 65.5%, 62.2%, and 36.6% respectively. Furthermore, we also present the qualitative results using high dimensional plot visualization in order to evaluate data distribution and sample image retrieval results. Overall, the Proxy-Anchor loss performs better than the other losses in terms of accuracy, recall, data separation, and image retrieval.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099770995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICACSIS51025.2020.9263132
DO - 10.1109/ICACSIS51025.2020.9263132
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85099770995
T3 - 2020 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems, ICACSIS 2020
SP - 177
EP - 186
BT - 2020 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems, ICACSIS 2020
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 12th International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems, ICACSIS 2020
Y2 - 17 October 2020 through 18 October 2020
ER -