Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its risk factors in rural area

Florentina Caroline Puspita Hapsari, Leonita Ariesti Putri, Cindy Rahardja, Amanda Pitarini Utari, Ari Fahrial Syam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is escalating in Asia. The present study aimed toinvestigate the prevalence of GERD symptoms as well as potential risk factors associated with GERD in residents in a rural area in Jakarta. Method: The study population consisted of subjects who aged 20 years or more and lived in rural area Kebon Bawang-Tanjung Priok, Jakarta. A self-administered questionnaire based on earlier validated questionnaire (GERDQ) was given. The questionnaire consisted of demographic characteristic, self and environment sanitary, social and past illness history, and the symptoms score for GERD. Total score for GERD's symptoms score was 18, with a score of at least 8 was considered to have symptomatic GERD. Results: The questionnaire was completed in 90 subjects. Of the 90 subjects, 12 (13.3%) had GERDQ score ‰¥ 8 which was the cut-off for definingpresence of GERD. On both univariate and multivariate analysis, age > 50 years old (OR = 6.33; 95% CI 1.1-35.6), handwashing habit before eating (OR = 6.93; 95% CI 1.1-43.8), and raw/tap water (OR = 10.28; 95% CI 0.8-130) were significantly associated with the presence of GERD. Conclusion: Prevalence of GERD was high (13.3%) in rural area in Jakarta. Age > 50 years old, handwashing habit before eating, and raw/tap waterwere risk factors for GERD in this population.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-14
JournalGastroenterology Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy Journal Vol 18 No 1, April 2017, Pg : 9-14
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Keywords

  • gastroesophageal reflux disease; prevalence; risk factors; rural area; Jakarta

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its risk factors in rural area'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this