TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of identification of the seniors at risk (isar) tool and triage risk-screening tool (trst) for frail elderly emergency room patients
AU - Rizka, Aulia
AU - Ambarwati, Riska Amalia
AU - Mansjoer, Arif
AU - Koesnoe, Sukamto
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding Disclosure: The study was supported by a research grant from Universitas Indonesia.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Pakistan Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Objective: This objective of this study was to measure the performance of the identification of the seniors at risk (ISAR) tool and triage risk-screening tool (TRST) for frailty screening in elderly emergency room (ER) patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study involving subjects aged 60 years or older was conducted at Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital ER from September-November 2018. Frailty was defined by the Forty Item Frailty Index (FI-40). The ISAR and TRST performance were measured as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV), positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+ and LR-) and the area under the curve (AUC). Results: A total of 471 subjects were examined, of which 300 (63.7%) were in the 60-69-year-old subgroup with a median age of 66 years and an age range of 60-95 years. There were 262 (55.6%) male subjects and 445 (94.5%) were non-trauma patients. According to the FI-40, 386 (82%) were classified as frail. ISAR and TRST showed a sensitivity of 87.6% vs 93.8%, a specificity of 58.8% vs 43.5%, a PPV of 90.6% vs 88.3%, an NPV of 51% vs 60.7%, a LR+ of 2.13 vs 1.66 and a LR- of 0.21 vs 0.14, respectively. Both had similar AUCs of 0.8 (95% CI: ISAR [0.76, 0.86] and TRST [0.75, 0.86], p = 0.91). Conclusion: ISAR and TRST showed outstanding frailty-screening results among elderly ER patients.
AB - Objective: This objective of this study was to measure the performance of the identification of the seniors at risk (ISAR) tool and triage risk-screening tool (TRST) for frailty screening in elderly emergency room (ER) patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study involving subjects aged 60 years or older was conducted at Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital ER from September-November 2018. Frailty was defined by the Forty Item Frailty Index (FI-40). The ISAR and TRST performance were measured as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV), positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+ and LR-) and the area under the curve (AUC). Results: A total of 471 subjects were examined, of which 300 (63.7%) were in the 60-69-year-old subgroup with a median age of 66 years and an age range of 60-95 years. There were 262 (55.6%) male subjects and 445 (94.5%) were non-trauma patients. According to the FI-40, 386 (82%) were classified as frail. ISAR and TRST showed a sensitivity of 87.6% vs 93.8%, a specificity of 58.8% vs 43.5%, a PPV of 90.6% vs 88.3%, an NPV of 51% vs 60.7%, a LR+ of 2.13 vs 1.66 and a LR- of 0.21 vs 0.14, respectively. Both had similar AUCs of 0.8 (95% CI: ISAR [0.76, 0.86] and TRST [0.75, 0.86], p = 0.91). Conclusion: ISAR and TRST showed outstanding frailty-screening results among elderly ER patients.
KW - (JPMA 71: S-42 [Suppl. 2]; 2021)
KW - Area under curve
KW - Emergency service
KW - Frailty
KW - Mass screening
KW - Sensitivity and specificity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103746115&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 33785940
AN - SCOPUS:85103746115
SN - 0030-9982
VL - 71
SP - S42-S45
JO - Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
JF - Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
IS - 2
ER -