Performance comparison of active network-based and non active network-based single-rate multicast congestion control protocols

Yansen Darmaputra; Riri Fitri Sari

Performance comparison of active network-based and non active network-based single-rate multicast congestion control protocols

Department of Electrical Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper presents the comparisons of two single-rate multicast protocol, Active Error Recovery/Nominee Congestion Avoidance (AER/ NCA) and Pragmatic General Multicast Congestion Control (PGMCC). Both protocols use worst receiver mechanism, NACK-based feedback, and window-based transmission rate adjustment. AER/NCA is implemented using the new Active Networks technology, while PGMCC is implemented using the traditional passive network. We discovered from the simulation results that both protocols are TCP-friendly. The implementation of active networks causes many computations to be done in the network so that it would degrade network performance. However, in high loss rates network, active networks technology could provide fast recovery to loss packets.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	234-240
Number of pages	7
Journal	Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume	3124
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2004

Cite this

@article{6349869bd3c945159a2ff95b64f81db8,

title = "Performance comparison of active network-based and non active network-based single-rate multicast congestion control protocols",

abstract = "This paper presents the comparisons of two single-rate multicast protocol, Active Error Recovery/Nominee Congestion Avoidance (AER/ NCA) and Pragmatic General Multicast Congestion Control (PGMCC). Both protocols use worst receiver mechanism, NACK-based feedback, and window-based transmission rate adjustment. AER/NCA is implemented using the new Active Networks technology, while PGMCC is implemented using the traditional passive network. We discovered from the simulation results that both protocols are TCP-friendly. The implementation of active networks causes many computations to be done in the network so that it would degrade network performance. However, in high loss rates network, active networks technology could provide fast recovery to loss packets.",

author = "Yansen Darmaputra and Sari, {Riri Fitri}",

year = "2004",

month = dec,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "3124",

pages = "234--240",

journal = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",

issn = "0302-9743",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

Performance comparison of active network-based and non active network-based single-rate multicast congestion control protocols. / Darmaputra, Yansen; Sari, Riri Fitri.
In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 3124, 01.12.2004, p. 234-240.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance comparison of active network-based and non active network-based single-rate multicast congestion control protocols

AU - Darmaputra, Yansen

AU - Sari, Riri Fitri

PY - 2004/12/1

Y1 - 2004/12/1

N2 - This paper presents the comparisons of two single-rate multicast protocol, Active Error Recovery/Nominee Congestion Avoidance (AER/ NCA) and Pragmatic General Multicast Congestion Control (PGMCC). Both protocols use worst receiver mechanism, NACK-based feedback, and window-based transmission rate adjustment. AER/NCA is implemented using the new Active Networks technology, while PGMCC is implemented using the traditional passive network. We discovered from the simulation results that both protocols are TCP-friendly. The implementation of active networks causes many computations to be done in the network so that it would degrade network performance. However, in high loss rates network, active networks technology could provide fast recovery to loss packets.

AB - This paper presents the comparisons of two single-rate multicast protocol, Active Error Recovery/Nominee Congestion Avoidance (AER/ NCA) and Pragmatic General Multicast Congestion Control (PGMCC). Both protocols use worst receiver mechanism, NACK-based feedback, and window-based transmission rate adjustment. AER/NCA is implemented using the new Active Networks technology, while PGMCC is implemented using the traditional passive network. We discovered from the simulation results that both protocols are TCP-friendly. The implementation of active networks causes many computations to be done in the network so that it would degrade network performance. However, in high loss rates network, active networks technology could provide fast recovery to loss packets.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35048873728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:35048873728

SN - 0302-9743

VL - 3124

SP - 234

EP - 240

JO - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

JF - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

ER -

Performance comparison of active network-based and non active network-based single-rate multicast congestion control protocols

Abstract

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this