TY - JOUR
T1 - Penerapan Open Science di Indonesia agar riset lebih terbuka, mudah Diakses, dan Meningkatkan Dampak Saintifik
AU - Irawan, Dasapta Erwin
AU - Rachmi, Cut Novianti
AU - Irawan, Hendy
AU - Abraham, Juneman
AU - Kusno, Kustiati
AU - Multazam, Mochammad Tanzil
AU - Rosada, KeuKeu Kaniawati
AU - Nugroho, Septriono Hari
AU - Kusumah, Galih
AU - Defny, null
AU - Aziz, Nurhazman Abdul
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - A significant development of open science movement has been witnessed in the last five years. This could bring a fresh start to Indonesian academia. The objective of this paper is to showcase the advancement of open science concept and implementation that can be adopted to increase impact. We did a literature review on peer-reviewed papers, websites of funding agency, open science blogs, and threads on Twitter. We believe the values of research output are not limited to a paper in a high reputation journal. Data is now considered as separate output, as well as, data management protocols, and laboratory notebooks. Publishing research results as a preprint is also used to disseminate findings as rapid and as fast as possible. Post publication peer-review is also added to the reviewing system to add openness, transparency, and objectivity. It offers credit to the reviewers. We also see the growth of impact indicators as the results of San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) statutory. More initiatives and technologies have been introduced to make science more open, transparent, and inclusive. With so many developments have been made, therefore it's not wise for Indonesian academia to rely themselves only to the old perception of research outputs and impact indicators.
AB - A significant development of open science movement has been witnessed in the last five years. This could bring a fresh start to Indonesian academia. The objective of this paper is to showcase the advancement of open science concept and implementation that can be adopted to increase impact. We did a literature review on peer-reviewed papers, websites of funding agency, open science blogs, and threads on Twitter. We believe the values of research output are not limited to a paper in a high reputation journal. Data is now considered as separate output, as well as, data management protocols, and laboratory notebooks. Publishing research results as a preprint is also used to disseminate findings as rapid and as fast as possible. Post publication peer-review is also added to the reviewing system to add openness, transparency, and objectivity. It offers credit to the reviewers. We also see the growth of impact indicators as the results of San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) statutory. More initiatives and technologies have been introduced to make science more open, transparent, and inclusive. With so many developments have been made, therefore it's not wise for Indonesian academia to rely themselves only to the old perception of research outputs and impact indicators.
KW - open science, open access, scientific publication
UR - https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/bip/article/view/17054/16608
U2 - 10.22146/bip.17054
DO - 10.22146/bip.17054
M3 - Article
SN - 2477-0361
VL - 13
SP - 25
EP - 36
JO - Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi
JF - Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi
IS - 1
ER -