TY - JOUR
T1 - On the relevance of modulation transfer function measurements in digital mammography quality control
AU - Wigati, Kristina T.
AU - Marshall, Nicholas W.
AU - Lemmens, Kim
AU - Binst, Joke
AU - Jacobs, Annelies
AU - Cockmartin, Lesley
AU - Zhang, Guozhi
AU - Vancoillie, Liesbeth
AU - Petrov, Dimitar
AU - Vandenbroucke, Dirk A.N.
AU - Soejoko, Djarwani S.
AU - Bosmans, Hilde
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is part of a PhD project funded by Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP). The authors would like to thank Janne Vignero and Michiel Dehairs for participating in the human observer study of the L1 phantom.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - Purpose: The relevance of presampling modulation transfer function (MTF) measurements in digital mammography (DM) quality control (QC) is examined. Two studies are presented: a case study on the impact of a reduction in MTF on the technical image quality score and analysis of the robustness of routine QC MTF measurements. Approach: In the first study, two needle computed radiography (CR) plates with identical sensitivities were used with differences in the 50% point of the MTF (fMTF0.5) larger than the limiting value in the European guidelines (>10 % change between successive measurements). Technical image quality was assessed via threshold gold thickness of the CDMAM phantom and threshold microcalcification diameter of the L1 structured phantom. For the second study, presampling MTF results from 595 half-yearly QC tests of 55 DM systems (16 types, six manufacturers) were analyzed for changes from the baseline value and changes in fMTF0.5 between successive tests. Results: A reduction of 20% in fMTF0.5 of the two CR plates was observed. There was a tendency to a lower score for task-based metrics, but none were significant. Averaging over 55 systems, the absolute relative change in fMTF0.5 between consecutive tests (with 95% confidence interval) was 3% (2.5% to 3.4%). Analysis of the maximum relative change from baseline revealed changes of up to-10 % for one a-Se based system and-15 % for a group of CsI-based systems. Conclusions: A limit of 10% is a relevant action level for investigation. If exceeded, then the impact on performance has to be verified with extra metrics.
AB - Purpose: The relevance of presampling modulation transfer function (MTF) measurements in digital mammography (DM) quality control (QC) is examined. Two studies are presented: a case study on the impact of a reduction in MTF on the technical image quality score and analysis of the robustness of routine QC MTF measurements. Approach: In the first study, two needle computed radiography (CR) plates with identical sensitivities were used with differences in the 50% point of the MTF (fMTF0.5) larger than the limiting value in the European guidelines (>10 % change between successive measurements). Technical image quality was assessed via threshold gold thickness of the CDMAM phantom and threshold microcalcification diameter of the L1 structured phantom. For the second study, presampling MTF results from 595 half-yearly QC tests of 55 DM systems (16 types, six manufacturers) were analyzed for changes from the baseline value and changes in fMTF0.5 between successive tests. Results: A reduction of 20% in fMTF0.5 of the two CR plates was observed. There was a tendency to a lower score for task-based metrics, but none were significant. Averaging over 55 systems, the absolute relative change in fMTF0.5 between consecutive tests (with 95% confidence interval) was 3% (2.5% to 3.4%). Analysis of the maximum relative change from baseline revealed changes of up to-10 % for one a-Se based system and-15 % for a group of CsI-based systems. Conclusions: A limit of 10% is a relevant action level for investigation. If exceeded, then the impact on performance has to be verified with extra metrics.
KW - digital mammography
KW - image quality
KW - modulation transfer function
KW - quality control
KW - sharpness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105541634&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1117/1.JMI.8.2.023505
DO - 10.1117/1.JMI.8.2.023505
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85105541634
SN - 2329-4302
VL - 8
JO - Journal of Medical Imaging
JF - Journal of Medical Imaging
IS - 2
M1 - 023505
ER -