TY - JOUR
T1 - Multi-Sectoral Partnership for Waste Management Evaluation and Awards Recognition in Higher Education
AU - Muzanni, Adonis
AU - Lestari, Fatma
AU - Zakiani,
AU - Chalid, Mochamad
AU - Wardani, Wulan Kusuma
AU - Satyawardhani, Saraswati Andani
AU - Kristanto, Gabriel Andari
AU - Zulys, Agustino
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by multisectoral partnership grant between Dow Indonesia and Universitas Indonesia particularly for evaluation of waste management and awards recognition. The authors would like to thank to Dow Indonesia for significant contribution for the evaluation of waste management implementation and awards recognition. The authors would like to also expand its gratitude to all the evaluators including Dr. Haruki Agustina from Ministry of Environment and Forestry Indonesia, Universitas Indonesia’s team and representative from local Environmental services, Depok, West Java Indonesia. In addition, authors would like to thank you to all key informant involved, including Prof. Dr. Ir. Dedi Priadi, DEA as Universitas Indonesia’s Vice Rector for Human Resources and Asset; University Facilities Director and staff; Universitas Indonesia’s Director of Partnership; Deans of faculties; Director of Schools and Programs, Faculty’s or Schools or Program’s facility managers, and all staff.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 WITPress. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Waste management is an important part to achieve green and sustainable campus. This study aims to evaluate waste management implementation in higher education. The methodology used in this study is a cross sectional with a non-probabilistic sampling. Data were collected using a well-structured evaluation instrument through an online focus group discussion, document review and evidence of implementation. The evaluation instrument consists of 10 elements: waste management policy, resource availability, waste segregation, waste collection, temporary waste storage, handling of general and hazardous waste, personal protective equipment (PPE), waste segregation awareness educational program, and evaluation on waste management. There were 15 faculties/schools/program were participated. Data was analysed using univariate analysis, radar plot representation, Box and Whiskers plot analysis. The level of waste management implementation amongst faculties /schools/program was varied between 52% to 98%. Higher education needs to evaluate waste management implementation and established a systematic environmental awareness program to achieve sustainability development goals (SDGs). The mean score ranking from highest to lowest level: personal protective equipment (5.6) to evaluation of waste management implementation (3.2). Indeed, to ensure a comprehensive general waste management, it was suggested that higher education need to build a centralized waste collection facility, a chemical waste treatment and competence personnel for handling laboratory waste.
AB - Waste management is an important part to achieve green and sustainable campus. This study aims to evaluate waste management implementation in higher education. The methodology used in this study is a cross sectional with a non-probabilistic sampling. Data were collected using a well-structured evaluation instrument through an online focus group discussion, document review and evidence of implementation. The evaluation instrument consists of 10 elements: waste management policy, resource availability, waste segregation, waste collection, temporary waste storage, handling of general and hazardous waste, personal protective equipment (PPE), waste segregation awareness educational program, and evaluation on waste management. There were 15 faculties/schools/program were participated. Data was analysed using univariate analysis, radar plot representation, Box and Whiskers plot analysis. The level of waste management implementation amongst faculties /schools/program was varied between 52% to 98%. Higher education needs to evaluate waste management implementation and established a systematic environmental awareness program to achieve sustainability development goals (SDGs). The mean score ranking from highest to lowest level: personal protective equipment (5.6) to evaluation of waste management implementation (3.2). Indeed, to ensure a comprehensive general waste management, it was suggested that higher education need to build a centralized waste collection facility, a chemical waste treatment and competence personnel for handling laboratory waste.
KW - environmental awareness
KW - environmental management
KW - higher education
KW - sustainability development goals
KW - waste management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136899427&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.18280/ijsdp.170419
DO - 10.18280/ijsdp.170419
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85136899427
SN - 1743-7601
VL - 17
SP - 1205
EP - 1213
JO - International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning
JF - International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning
IS - 4
ER -
