TY - JOUR
T1 - Modelling of Fuel Filter Clogging of B20 Fuel Based on the Precipitate Measurement and Filter Blocking Test
AU - Paryanto, Imam
AU - Budianta, Ilyin Abdi
AU - Alifia, Kanya Citta Hani
AU - Darmawan, Muhammad Arif
AU - Judistira,
AU - Prakoso, Tirto
AU - Indarto, Antonius
AU - Gozan, Misri
AU - HIDAYATULLAH, IBNU MAULANA
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by The Ministry of Research and Higher Education of Indonesia through the research grant “Hibah Penelitian Dasar Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi ” (PDUPT) 2021 (NKB-854/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2022). The authors also gratefully acknowledged the financial support for publication by Universitas Indonesia through the scheme of “Hibah Publikasi Terindeks Internasional ” (PUTI) Q1 2022 (NKB-1151/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2022).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - The amount of precipitate and residue affects the timing of fuel filter blockage. This study develops a model for fuel filter blocking based on the Precipitate Measurement. Firstly, a modification of ASTM D 7501 for the Cold Soak Filtration Test (CSFT) measured the amount of precipitate in B20 fuel with variations of soaking temperatures and monoglyceride content in biodiesel. Then, a modified ASTM D 2068 for a filter blocking test (FBT) was conducted to correlate the impurities in the B20 fuel and the clogging limit effects represented by the change of pressure difference and time to reach a pressure drop of 30 kPa. Biodiesel B20 samples were prepared by adding monopalmitin so that each had a monoglyceride value of 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, and 0.8% before blending with petroleum diesel. The modified CSFT showed that the amount of B0 impurity was almost zero. However, the amount of the B20 sample precipitate retained on the filter was higher when a lower soaking temperature and higher monoglyceride content was used in the biodiesel. Similar results in the modified FBT showed that the more impurities, the faster the pressure drop achieved a level of 30 kPa. A much shorter time was needed to reach the pressure drop of 30 kPa for B20 fuel samples with the impurities present in both test powders and precipitate compared to those for the B20 fuel samples with a single type of impurity (either test powders or precipitate). The fuel filter clogging time could also be predicted using the graph of fuel filter clogging time vs. the precipitate weight of B20 fuel derived from the FBT test if the precipitate weight had already been determined by the precipitation test (modified CSFT). The simulation model using Ergun’s equation for the FBT of the B20 fuel could also show similar results to that of the FBT experiment, with the difference (averaged errors) ranging from 4.15% to 5.79%.
AB - The amount of precipitate and residue affects the timing of fuel filter blockage. This study develops a model for fuel filter blocking based on the Precipitate Measurement. Firstly, a modification of ASTM D 7501 for the Cold Soak Filtration Test (CSFT) measured the amount of precipitate in B20 fuel with variations of soaking temperatures and monoglyceride content in biodiesel. Then, a modified ASTM D 2068 for a filter blocking test (FBT) was conducted to correlate the impurities in the B20 fuel and the clogging limit effects represented by the change of pressure difference and time to reach a pressure drop of 30 kPa. Biodiesel B20 samples were prepared by adding monopalmitin so that each had a monoglyceride value of 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, and 0.8% before blending with petroleum diesel. The modified CSFT showed that the amount of B0 impurity was almost zero. However, the amount of the B20 sample precipitate retained on the filter was higher when a lower soaking temperature and higher monoglyceride content was used in the biodiesel. Similar results in the modified FBT showed that the more impurities, the faster the pressure drop achieved a level of 30 kPa. A much shorter time was needed to reach the pressure drop of 30 kPa for B20 fuel samples with the impurities present in both test powders and precipitate compared to those for the B20 fuel samples with a single type of impurity (either test powders or precipitate). The fuel filter clogging time could also be predicted using the graph of fuel filter clogging time vs. the precipitate weight of B20 fuel derived from the FBT test if the precipitate weight had already been determined by the precipitation test (modified CSFT). The simulation model using Ergun’s equation for the FBT of the B20 fuel could also show similar results to that of the FBT experiment, with the difference (averaged errors) ranging from 4.15% to 5.79%.
KW - B20 fuel
KW - biodiesel
KW - fuel filter blocking
KW - precipitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144712606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/chemengineering6060084
DO - 10.3390/chemengineering6060084
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85144712606
SN - 2305-7084
VL - 6
JO - ChemEngineering
JF - ChemEngineering
IS - 6
M1 - 84
ER -