Legal Protection Notary/PPAT Regarding False Information Submitted by Consident in Deed of Sale and Purchase

Muhamad Rafi Fakhrudin, Gandjar Admiral Bonaprapta

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewpeer-review

Abstract

This study analyse Notary/PPAT responsibilities and protection effort law for Notary/PPAT against false information submitted by the consident in the deed of sale and purchase. Use study juridical normative, this research find that PPAT is responsible answer full to deed they made, description falsehoods conveyed by the facers fully become not quite enough answered the presenters, while PPAT was inside matter there is no responsible answer or not can requested not quite enough sue on losses incurred from exists information false facing. Notary/PPAT required get protection law and the Regional MKN must give agreement because, testimony from the relevant Notary/PPAT is required in make bright something cases carried out by a Notary in accordance with Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)62-73
JournalAlauddin Law Development Journal
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Mar 2024

Keywords

  • Deed of Sale and Purchase
  • False Information
  • Notary/PPAT
  • Protection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Legal Protection Notary/PPAT Regarding False Information Submitted by Consident in Deed of Sale and Purchase'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this