TY - JOUR
T1 - Laser hemorrhoidoplasty for hemorrhoidal disease
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Lie, Hendry
AU - Caesarini, Evelyn Franca
AU - Purnama, Antonius Agung
AU - Irawan, Andry
AU - Sudirman, Taufik
AU - Jeo, Wifanto Saditya
AU - Budiono, Bernardus Parish
AU - Prabowo, Erik
AU - Rivai, M. Iqbal
AU - Sitepu, Ryanto Karobuana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is known as a new minimally invasive and painless procedure for symptomatic hemorrhoids. However, Milligan-Morgan (MM) may offer the best result of long-term cure rates. In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy between LHP and MM for hemorrhoidal disease treatment. Using specific keywords, we comprehensively go through the potential articles on PubMed, Europe PMC, and Google Scholar sources until April 19, 2022. All published studies on LHP and MM hemorrhoidectomy were collected. Statistical analysis was done by using Review Manager 5.4 software. Twelve studies with a total of 1756 patients with hemorrhoid grades II–IV were included for the analysis. Our pooled analysis revealed that LHP was associated with shorter operative time (p < 0.00001), shorter length of hospital stay (p = 0.0005), lower risk of urinary retention (p = 0.005) and anal stenosis (p = 0.0004), and lower VAS 24-h post-operative (p < 0.00001) when compared with MM. However, LHP and MM did not differ in terms of recurrence rate (p = 0.70). LHP was superior to MM procedure in terms of shortening the recovery time and minimizing post-operative complications for patients with hemorrhoidal disease.
AB - Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is known as a new minimally invasive and painless procedure for symptomatic hemorrhoids. However, Milligan-Morgan (MM) may offer the best result of long-term cure rates. In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy between LHP and MM for hemorrhoidal disease treatment. Using specific keywords, we comprehensively go through the potential articles on PubMed, Europe PMC, and Google Scholar sources until April 19, 2022. All published studies on LHP and MM hemorrhoidectomy were collected. Statistical analysis was done by using Review Manager 5.4 software. Twelve studies with a total of 1756 patients with hemorrhoid grades II–IV were included for the analysis. Our pooled analysis revealed that LHP was associated with shorter operative time (p < 0.00001), shorter length of hospital stay (p = 0.0005), lower risk of urinary retention (p = 0.005) and anal stenosis (p = 0.0004), and lower VAS 24-h post-operative (p < 0.00001) when compared with MM. However, LHP and MM did not differ in terms of recurrence rate (p = 0.70). LHP was superior to MM procedure in terms of shortening the recovery time and minimizing post-operative complications for patients with hemorrhoidal disease.
KW - Hemorrhoids
KW - Laser
KW - Minimal invasive
KW - Rectum
KW - Surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137867869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10103-022-03643-8
DO - 10.1007/s10103-022-03643-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 36094598
AN - SCOPUS:85137867869
VL - 37
SP - 3621
EP - 3630
JO - Lasers in Medical Science
JF - Lasers in Medical Science
SN - 0268-8921
IS - 9
ER -