TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigating Knocking Potential, Cycle Stability, and Emission Characteristics in Lean Spark Ignition Engine with Gasoline, Ethanol, and Methanol
AU - Mokhtar,
AU - Sugiarto, Bambang
AU - Agama, Askar Adika
AU - Kurniawan, Ade
AU - Auzani, Ahmad Syihan
AU - Nugroho, Bagus Anang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - This research examined the use of gasoline-ethanol-methanol on the performance of Spark ignition engine with a focus on a ternary fuel mix (gasoline, ethanol and methanol). It also investigated the various combustion characteristics in lean conditions, such as the potential for knocking, ignition delay, and engine performance. Methanol was added to mitigate knocking potential when used in small quantities and reduce ignition delay times during combustion, specifically at leaner air-fuel mixtures. The best decrease in ignition delay was observed with the E5M15 blend, where λ at values of 1.3 and 1.0 had E5M15 SoC of 325 CA° and 3215 CA°, respectively. The CCV results showed a more sloping increase in COV (coefficient of variation) value when using GEM fuel, particularly with the addition of more methanol. Furthermore, methanol was used to increase combustion progression and the ability of the fuel blend to sustain combustion under lean conditions. The torque and power units are not significantly different at values of 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2, but different below 1.3.
AB - This research examined the use of gasoline-ethanol-methanol on the performance of Spark ignition engine with a focus on a ternary fuel mix (gasoline, ethanol and methanol). It also investigated the various combustion characteristics in lean conditions, such as the potential for knocking, ignition delay, and engine performance. Methanol was added to mitigate knocking potential when used in small quantities and reduce ignition delay times during combustion, specifically at leaner air-fuel mixtures. The best decrease in ignition delay was observed with the E5M15 blend, where λ at values of 1.3 and 1.0 had E5M15 SoC of 325 CA° and 3215 CA°, respectively. The CCV results showed a more sloping increase in COV (coefficient of variation) value when using GEM fuel, particularly with the addition of more methanol. Furthermore, methanol was used to increase combustion progression and the ability of the fuel blend to sustain combustion under lean conditions. The torque and power units are not significantly different at values of 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2, but different below 1.3.
KW - AFR
KW - COV
KW - Gasoline Ethanol Methanol
KW - Performance
KW - SoC
KW - Spark ignition engine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194194997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.31603/ae.10607
DO - 10.31603/ae.10607
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85194194997
SN - 2615-6202
VL - 7
SP - 48
EP - 62
JO - Automotive Experiences
JF - Automotive Experiences
IS - 1
ER -