TY - JOUR
T1 - Institutional Activism
T2 - Seeking Customary Forest Rights Recognition from Within the Indonesian State
AU - Afiff, Suraya Abdulwahab
AU - Rachman, Noer Fauzi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 The Australian National University.
PY - 2019/11/3
Y1 - 2019/11/3
N2 - This article aims to explain why the adat movement activists in Indonesia could expand their campaigns for state recognition of adat community rights to activities from within the state apparatus. We argue that three combined processes have contributed to the conjuncture that made institutional activism possible: the preparation of the 2014 national election offered activists opportunities to influence the government agenda; the emergence of a conscious strategy for conducting institutional activism; and the coalitions between some key state officials and the movement’s actors. This article also analyses the problems that institutional activists faced, in particular resistance from influential actors at various government units who were not sympathetic to the adat movement’s agenda. Therefore, the impact of this activism on policy changes so far remains limited. The authors’ personal involvement in this case of institutional activism to promote customary forest provided access to the information for this article.
AB - This article aims to explain why the adat movement activists in Indonesia could expand their campaigns for state recognition of adat community rights to activities from within the state apparatus. We argue that three combined processes have contributed to the conjuncture that made institutional activism possible: the preparation of the 2014 national election offered activists opportunities to influence the government agenda; the emergence of a conscious strategy for conducting institutional activism; and the coalitions between some key state officials and the movement’s actors. This article also analyses the problems that institutional activists faced, in particular resistance from influential actors at various government units who were not sympathetic to the adat movement’s agenda. Therefore, the impact of this activism on policy changes so far remains limited. The authors’ personal involvement in this case of institutional activism to promote customary forest provided access to the information for this article.
KW - Customary Forest
KW - Indigenous Land Rights
KW - Institutional Activists
KW - Masyarakat Adat
KW - State–Movements Interaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074795079&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14442213.2019.1670245
DO - 10.1080/14442213.2019.1670245
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074795079
SN - 1444-2213
VL - 20
SP - 453
EP - 470
JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology
JF - Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology
IS - 5
ER -