Indonesia’s Handling of Terrorists’ Cyber Activities: How Repressive Measures Still Fall Short

Ali Abdullah Wibisono, Rachel Kumendong, Iwa Maulana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The article examines discrepancies between the Indonesian government’s response to terrorist cyber activities and the actual activities of terrorists online. By analysing data from 55 convicted terrorists, the study reveals that while government efforts focus on censoring extremist content on social media and websites, terrorists have shifted to using messaging platforms for tactical coordination. This shift indicates that current censorship and platform removal strategies are ineffective in preventing terrorists from exploiting cyberspace. The article highlights that repressive measures, such as criminal prosecution and strict regulation, may undermine the roles of users, platform managers and tech companies in content moderation. Additionally, these measures could drive terrorists to smaller, less monitored platforms, ultimately failing to curb their online activities and compromising freedom of expression. The findings suggest that a more nuanced approach is needed to address terrorist use of cyberspace effectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)134-160
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Asian Security and International Affairs
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • cyber-security
  • information technology
  • internet use
  • national security
  • policy analysis
  • Terrorism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indonesia’s Handling of Terrorists’ Cyber Activities: How Repressive Measures Still Fall Short'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this