TY - JOUR
T1 - In auditor we trust
T2 - 44 years of research on the auditor-client relationship and future research directions
AU - Mustikarini, Arizona
AU - Adhariani, Desi
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to acknowledge the valuable feedback from the reviewer and editor as well as from our colleagues: Ziaul Haque Munim (University of South-Eastern Norway) and Stephen Zamore (University of Agder, Norway). They also appreciate the funding support from the Research Fellowship, School of Business and Law, University of Agder Norway and Publication Grant from Universitas Indonesia.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2022/4/13
Y1 - 2022/4/13
N2 - Purpose: This study aims to review the auditor-client relationship (ACR) literature spanning 1976 to 2019 to provide future research directions. Design/methodology/approach: The study analysed 140 articles from the Web of Science database, authored by 259 scholars across 28 countries and published in 47 journals. It identified three major research streams to understand the ACR dynamics: auditor tenure, ACR attributes and auditor-client negotiation. Findings: Three major findings emerged based on this review. First, few studies examine auditor-client negotiation relative to other streams; thus, it offers scope for further research. Second, given that various fields have used diverse frameworks as theoretical underpinnings in prior studies, continuing this trend can better portray ACR from multiple perspectives. Finally, despite strong international regulations on ACR aspects such as auditor independence, tenure and rotation, implementation in several countries warrants special considerations, specifically on legal enforcement and investor protection, given diverse cultures and country-level institutional environments. Originality/value: This study contributes to the synthesis of existing and emerging research streams and provides future research suggestions.
AB - Purpose: This study aims to review the auditor-client relationship (ACR) literature spanning 1976 to 2019 to provide future research directions. Design/methodology/approach: The study analysed 140 articles from the Web of Science database, authored by 259 scholars across 28 countries and published in 47 journals. It identified three major research streams to understand the ACR dynamics: auditor tenure, ACR attributes and auditor-client negotiation. Findings: Three major findings emerged based on this review. First, few studies examine auditor-client negotiation relative to other streams; thus, it offers scope for further research. Second, given that various fields have used diverse frameworks as theoretical underpinnings in prior studies, continuing this trend can better portray ACR from multiple perspectives. Finally, despite strong international regulations on ACR aspects such as auditor independence, tenure and rotation, implementation in several countries warrants special considerations, specifically on legal enforcement and investor protection, given diverse cultures and country-level institutional environments. Originality/value: This study contributes to the synthesis of existing and emerging research streams and provides future research suggestions.
KW - Auditor-client interaction
KW - Auditor-client negotiation
KW - Auditor-client relationship
KW - Bibliometric
KW - Content analysis
KW - Literature review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103905781&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/MEDAR-11-2020-1062
DO - 10.1108/MEDAR-11-2020-1062
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85103905781
SN - 2049-372X
VL - 30
SP - 267
EP - 292
JO - Meditari Accountancy Research
JF - Meditari Accountancy Research
IS - 2
ER -