TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving Evidence'Based Practice in Forensic Medicine
T2 - Validation of INtegration of Forensic Epidemiology and the Rigorous EvaluatioN of Causation Elements and Principles of Evidence'Based Reporting in FORensic Medicine'Pathology version in Indonesia
AU - Meilia, Putri Dianita Ika
AU - Herkutanto,
AU - Purwadianto, Agus
AU - Sampurna, Budi
AU - Abdullah, Murdani
AU - Soemantri, Diantha
AU - Kekalih, Aria
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Indonesian College of Forensic Medicine (Kolegium Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik Indonesia/KIKFI), the Indonesian Association of Forensic Medicine (Perhimpunan Dokter Forensik Indonesia/PDFI), and the Doctoral Program of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia. We would also like to thank the panel members of Phase 2 and the participants of Phase 3 for their contribution. Furthermore, in loving memory of Saptawati Bardosono, who was involved in the conceptualization of this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 2023 Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: Expert opinions presented in legal proceedings should be scientifically accountable, which is known as evidence-based practice (EBP). Although forensic medical expert opinions are essential in legal proceedings, the methods used to formulate them are not always evidence based or based on standard methods. In forensic medicine, EBP has not been explicitly applied, including in Indonesia. One potential approach to formulate evidence-based expert opinions is called INtegration of Forensic Epidemiology and the Rigorous EvaluatioN of Causation Elements (INFERENCE). In addition, there is also no universal guideline for making forensic pathological reports. One prospective guideline is named the Principles of Evidence-based Reporting in FORensic Medicine-Pathology version (PERFORM-P). Methods: This article describes the validation process of INFERENCE and PERFORM-P in Indonesia. This study uses a mixed method through three interrelated phases, i.e., (1) a cross-sectional survey to determine the characteristics of Indonesian forensic doctors and their current practice, (2) the adaptation and validation process of the two tools through a review by the Indonesian College of Forensic Medicine, and (3) a one-group pre-postintervention study to assess the validity and reliability of forensic medical expert opinions formulated using Indonesian-INFERENCE (i-INFERENCE) and reported using Indonesian-PERFORM-P (i-PERFORM-P). Results and Discussion: In general, both tools received a positive reception and can potentially be used in the Indonesian setting with some additions/clarifications in the user manuals. Participants envision that both tools will be most useful in complex cases. Conclusions: By obtaining the i-INFERENCE and the i-PERFORM-P, it is hoped that Indonesian forensic medical doctors are better equipped in analyzing and reporting complex cases, and the implementation of EBP can be improved.
AB - Introduction: Expert opinions presented in legal proceedings should be scientifically accountable, which is known as evidence-based practice (EBP). Although forensic medical expert opinions are essential in legal proceedings, the methods used to formulate them are not always evidence based or based on standard methods. In forensic medicine, EBP has not been explicitly applied, including in Indonesia. One potential approach to formulate evidence-based expert opinions is called INtegration of Forensic Epidemiology and the Rigorous EvaluatioN of Causation Elements (INFERENCE). In addition, there is also no universal guideline for making forensic pathological reports. One prospective guideline is named the Principles of Evidence-based Reporting in FORensic Medicine-Pathology version (PERFORM-P). Methods: This article describes the validation process of INFERENCE and PERFORM-P in Indonesia. This study uses a mixed method through three interrelated phases, i.e., (1) a cross-sectional survey to determine the characteristics of Indonesian forensic doctors and their current practice, (2) the adaptation and validation process of the two tools through a review by the Indonesian College of Forensic Medicine, and (3) a one-group pre-postintervention study to assess the validity and reliability of forensic medical expert opinions formulated using Indonesian-INFERENCE (i-INFERENCE) and reported using Indonesian-PERFORM-P (i-PERFORM-P). Results and Discussion: In general, both tools received a positive reception and can potentially be used in the Indonesian setting with some additions/clarifications in the user manuals. Participants envision that both tools will be most useful in complex cases. Conclusions: By obtaining the i-INFERENCE and the i-PERFORM-P, it is hoped that Indonesian forensic medical doctors are better equipped in analyzing and reporting complex cases, and the implementation of EBP can be improved.
KW - Evidence-based practice
KW - forensic medicine
KW - forensic pathology
KW - INFERENCE
KW - Principles of Evidence-based Reporting in FORensic Medicine-Pathology version
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173716742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_47_22
DO - 10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_47_22
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85173716742
SN - 2349-5014
VL - 9
SP - 236
EP - 249
JO - Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine
JF - Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine
IS - 3
ER -