TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Estimated Plasma Volume Status on Mortality in Right Heart Failure Patients
T2 - A Retrospective Cohort Study in Indonesia
AU - Soetjoadi, Hannah
AU - Friska, Dewi
AU - Siswanto, Bambang Budi
AU - Muliawan, Hary Sakti
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s).
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: Plasma volume (PV) expansion hallmarks the syndrome of heart failure (HF) but is difficult to be quantified noninvasively. Estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) has marked prognostic utility in the failing left heart, however its use in right heart failure (RHF) remains unknown. This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of ePVS among isolated RHF patients. Methods: We retrospectively collected 208 patients admitted for RHF in our hospital from the electronic database from 2017 to 2019. ePVS was calculated using the Hakim formula. Patients were divided into low and high groups based on their PV value. Logistic regression was used to compare the odds of in-hospital mortality between these groups. Results: The overall in-hospital mortality was 12.5%, tripled from the low group to the high group (6.7% vs. 18.3%), within a median of 6 (3–19) days. High ePVS significantly predicted mortality in RHF, even after being adjusted for demographic, hemodynamic, chemistry, and medication variables (adjusted OR: 5.83, 95% CI: 1.62–20.95, p < 0.01). Conclusion: ePVS is associated with in-hospital mortality among isolated RHF patients. Given not only the wide accessibility of hemogram but also the low cost and the rapid quantification of relative PV, this simple tool can potentially aid in optimizing RHF management, especially in rural area, although further evaluation is warranted.
AB - Background: Plasma volume (PV) expansion hallmarks the syndrome of heart failure (HF) but is difficult to be quantified noninvasively. Estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) has marked prognostic utility in the failing left heart, however its use in right heart failure (RHF) remains unknown. This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of ePVS among isolated RHF patients. Methods: We retrospectively collected 208 patients admitted for RHF in our hospital from the electronic database from 2017 to 2019. ePVS was calculated using the Hakim formula. Patients were divided into low and high groups based on their PV value. Logistic regression was used to compare the odds of in-hospital mortality between these groups. Results: The overall in-hospital mortality was 12.5%, tripled from the low group to the high group (6.7% vs. 18.3%), within a median of 6 (3–19) days. High ePVS significantly predicted mortality in RHF, even after being adjusted for demographic, hemodynamic, chemistry, and medication variables (adjusted OR: 5.83, 95% CI: 1.62–20.95, p < 0.01). Conclusion: ePVS is associated with in-hospital mortality among isolated RHF patients. Given not only the wide accessibility of hemogram but also the low cost and the rapid quantification of relative PV, this simple tool can potentially aid in optimizing RHF management, especially in rural area, although further evaluation is warranted.
KW - mortality
KW - plasma volume
KW - prognosis
KW - right ventricular failure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137089419&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5334/GH.1136
DO - 10.5334/GH.1136
M3 - Article
C2 - 36051319
AN - SCOPUS:85137089419
SN - 2211-8160
VL - 17
JO - Global Heart
JF - Global Heart
IS - 1
M1 - 60
ER -