Health-economic evaluation of meniscus tear treatments: a systematic review

R. Deviandri, M. C. Daulay, D. Iskandar, A. P. Kautsar, A. M.T. Lubis, M. J. Postma

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the overall evidence of published health-economic evaluation studies on meniscus tear treatment. Methods: Our systematic review focuses on health-economic evaluation studies of meniscus tear treatment interventions found in PubMed and Embase databases. A qualitative, descriptive approach was used to analyze the studies’ results and systematically report them following PRISMA guidelines. The health-economic evaluation method for each included study was categorized following one of the four approaches: partial economic evaluation (PEE), cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), cost–benefit analysis (CBA), or cost-utility analysis (CUA). The quality of each included study was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) list. Comparisons of input variables and outcomes were made, if applicable. Results: Sixteen studies were included; of these, six studies performed PEE, seven studies CUA, two studies CEA, and one study combined CBA, CUA, and CEA. The following economic comparisons were analyzed and showed the respective comparative outcomes: (1) meniscus repair was more cost-effective than arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (meniscectomy) for reparable meniscus tear; (2) non-operative treatment or physical therapy was less costly than meniscectomy for degenerative meniscus tear; (3) physical therapy with delayed meniscectomy was more cost-effective than early meniscectomy for meniscus tear with knee osteoarthritis; (4) meniscectomy without physical therapy was less costly than meniscectomy with physical therapy; (5) meniscectomy was more cost-effective than either meniscus allograft transplantation or meniscus scaffold procedure; (6) the conventional arthroscopic instrument cost was lower than laser-assisted arthroscopy in meniscectomy procedures. Conclusion: Results from this review suggest that meniscus repair is the most cost-effective intervention for reparable meniscus tears. Physical therapy followed by delayed meniscectomy is the most cost-effective intervention for degenerative meniscus tears. Meniscus scaffold should be avoided, especially when implemented on a large scale. Level of evidence: Systematic review of level IV studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3582-3593
Number of pages12
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Volume31
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2023

Keywords

  • Cost
  • Cost analysis
  • Economic analysis
  • Meniscus injury
  • Meniscus tear
  • Systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Health-economic evaluation of meniscus tear treatments: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this