TY - JOUR
T1 - Farmer-plant-breeders and the law on Java, Indonesia
AU - Antons, Christoph
AU - Winarto, Yunita T.
AU - Prihandiani, Adlinanur F.
N1 - This research was supported under the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects funding scheme (project number DP170100747
PY - 2020/9/30
Y1 - 2020/9/30
N2 - In the last two decades, some Javanese rice farmers have learned to be plant breeders with the help of Farmer Field Schools for Participatory Plant Breeding. However, they have experienced problems with seed and intellectual property laws primarily focused on the strengthening of the seed industry and compliance with development plans. A number of farmers have been prosecuted for experimenting with seeds, prompting a partly successful challenge to relevant provisions in Indonesia’s Constitutional Court. Subsequent legislative changes have restored some farmers’ rights, but also brought new reporting requirements and limitations. Using James Scott’s concept of “transformative state simplifications,” this article shows that legal challenges to regulations are just one strategy of self-help. The political reform process and possibility for constitutional challenges have opened up space for debates about how farmers can benefit from laws that seek to regulate their cultivars. The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and other developments are likely to intensify discussions about what precisely various laws mean by their encouragement of “small farmer varieties,” “food sovereignty,” and a “sustainable agricultural cultivation system.”.
AB - In the last two decades, some Javanese rice farmers have learned to be plant breeders with the help of Farmer Field Schools for Participatory Plant Breeding. However, they have experienced problems with seed and intellectual property laws primarily focused on the strengthening of the seed industry and compliance with development plans. A number of farmers have been prosecuted for experimenting with seeds, prompting a partly successful challenge to relevant provisions in Indonesia’s Constitutional Court. Subsequent legislative changes have restored some farmers’ rights, but also brought new reporting requirements and limitations. Using James Scott’s concept of “transformative state simplifications,” this article shows that legal challenges to regulations are just one strategy of self-help. The political reform process and possibility for constitutional challenges have opened up space for debates about how farmers can benefit from laws that seek to regulate their cultivars. The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and other developments are likely to intensify discussions about what precisely various laws mean by their encouragement of “small farmer varieties,” “food sovereignty,” and a “sustainable agricultural cultivation system.”.
KW - farmer varieties
KW - Farmer-plant-breeders
KW - food sovereignty
KW - plant variety protection
KW - sustainable agriculture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091774956&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14672715.2020.1822750
DO - 10.1080/14672715.2020.1822750
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85091774956
SN - 1467-2715
VL - 52
SP - 589
EP - 609
JO - Critical Asian Studies
JF - Critical Asian Studies
IS - 4
ER -