TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors affecting vaccination demand in Indonesia
T2 - a secondary analysis and multimethods national assessment
AU - Jusril, Hafizah
AU - Rachmi, Cut Novianti
AU - Amin, Mohammad Ruhul
AU - Dynes, Michelle
AU - Sitohang, Vensya
AU - Untung, Andi Sari Bunga
AU - Damayanti, Rita
AU - Ariawan, Iwan
AU - Pronyk, Paul M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by UNICEF Indonesia through Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance [SC190004 2018–2021].
Publisher Copyright:
© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022.
PY - 2022/8/11
Y1 - 2022/8/11
N2 - Objectives Vaccine hesitancy remains a major barrier to immunisation coverage worldwide. We explored influence of hesitancy on coverage and factors contributing to vaccine uptake during a national measles-rubella (MR) campaign in Indonesia. Design Secondary analyses of qualitative and quantitative data sets from existing cross-sectional studies conducted during and around the campaign. Methods Quantitative data used in this assessment included daily coverage reports generated by health workers, district risk profiles that indicate precampaign immunisation programme performance, and reports of campaign cessation due to vaccine hesitancy. We used t-test and χ 2 tests for associations. The qualitative assessment employed three parallel national and regional studies. Deductive thematic analysis examined factors for acceptance among caregivers, health providers and programme managers. Results Coverage data were reported from 6462 health facilities across 395 districts from 1 August to 31 December 2018. The average district coverage was 73%, with wide variation between districts (2%-100%). One-third of districts fell below 70% coverage thresholds. Sixty-two of 395 (16%) districts paused the campaign due to hesitancy. Coverage among districts that never paused campaign activities due to hesitancy was significantly higher than rates for districts ever-pausing the campaign (81% vs 42%; p<0.001). Precampaign adequacy of district immunisation programmes did not explain coverage gaps (p=0.210). Qualitative analysis identified acceptance enablers including using digital health monitoring and feedback systems, increasing caregiver knowledge and awareness, making immunisation social norm, effective cross-sectoral collaboration, conducive service environment and positive experiences for mothers and children. Barriers included misinformation diffusion on social media, halal-haram issues, lack of healthcare provider knowledge, negative family influences and traditions, previous poor experiences and misinformation on adverse events. Conclusion Barriers to vaccine uptake contributed to coverage gaps during national MR campaign in Indonesia. A range of supply-related and demand-related strategies were identified to address hesitancy contributors. Advancing a portfolio of tailored multilevel interventions will be critical to enhance vaccine acceptance.
AB - Objectives Vaccine hesitancy remains a major barrier to immunisation coverage worldwide. We explored influence of hesitancy on coverage and factors contributing to vaccine uptake during a national measles-rubella (MR) campaign in Indonesia. Design Secondary analyses of qualitative and quantitative data sets from existing cross-sectional studies conducted during and around the campaign. Methods Quantitative data used in this assessment included daily coverage reports generated by health workers, district risk profiles that indicate precampaign immunisation programme performance, and reports of campaign cessation due to vaccine hesitancy. We used t-test and χ 2 tests for associations. The qualitative assessment employed three parallel national and regional studies. Deductive thematic analysis examined factors for acceptance among caregivers, health providers and programme managers. Results Coverage data were reported from 6462 health facilities across 395 districts from 1 August to 31 December 2018. The average district coverage was 73%, with wide variation between districts (2%-100%). One-third of districts fell below 70% coverage thresholds. Sixty-two of 395 (16%) districts paused the campaign due to hesitancy. Coverage among districts that never paused campaign activities due to hesitancy was significantly higher than rates for districts ever-pausing the campaign (81% vs 42%; p<0.001). Precampaign adequacy of district immunisation programmes did not explain coverage gaps (p=0.210). Qualitative analysis identified acceptance enablers including using digital health monitoring and feedback systems, increasing caregiver knowledge and awareness, making immunisation social norm, effective cross-sectoral collaboration, conducive service environment and positive experiences for mothers and children. Barriers included misinformation diffusion on social media, halal-haram issues, lack of healthcare provider knowledge, negative family influences and traditions, previous poor experiences and misinformation on adverse events. Conclusion Barriers to vaccine uptake contributed to coverage gaps during national MR campaign in Indonesia. A range of supply-related and demand-related strategies were identified to address hesitancy contributors. Advancing a portfolio of tailored multilevel interventions will be critical to enhance vaccine acceptance.
KW - community child health
KW - paediatric infectious disease & immunisation
KW - public health
KW - quality in health care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136341055&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058570
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058570
M3 - Article
C2 - 35953251
AN - SCOPUS:85136341055
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 12
JO - BMJ open
JF - BMJ open
IS - 8
M1 - e058570
ER -