TY - JOUR
T1 - Facies modeling of Kais Formation limestone
T2 - A case study of Kafor field, West Papua, Indonesia
AU - Haris, Abd.
AU - Siburian, Irwan Barlett
AU - Riyanto, Agus
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Int. J. of GEOMATE.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Facies modeling of Kais Formation limestone was carried out in the Kafor field, West Papua. Kais Formation limestone of Middle Miocene ages is the main reservoir that produces hydrocarbon in Kafor field. This field is located at Bintuni, West Papua. The objectives of this work are to perform detailed depositional facies analysis and to interpret the diagenesis process using rock typing for assessing the potential of the carbonate reservoir. Kais Formation limestone was classified into three members; Upper Kais, Middle Kais, and Lower Kais, which are associated with five different facies (i.e., shelf, front reef, inter reef, back reef, and core reef facies). The associated facies were interpreted as reefal platform carbonate. The reservoir quality was reviewed by facies distribution, petrography, and biostratigraphy. Our analysis shows that the Upper and Middle Kais were controlled by compaction and dominated by fractured porosity, while in contrast, the Lower Kais was controlled by dolomitization and dissolution diagenesis.
AB - Facies modeling of Kais Formation limestone was carried out in the Kafor field, West Papua. Kais Formation limestone of Middle Miocene ages is the main reservoir that produces hydrocarbon in Kafor field. This field is located at Bintuni, West Papua. The objectives of this work are to perform detailed depositional facies analysis and to interpret the diagenesis process using rock typing for assessing the potential of the carbonate reservoir. Kais Formation limestone was classified into three members; Upper Kais, Middle Kais, and Lower Kais, which are associated with five different facies (i.e., shelf, front reef, inter reef, back reef, and core reef facies). The associated facies were interpreted as reefal platform carbonate. The reservoir quality was reviewed by facies distribution, petrography, and biostratigraphy. Our analysis shows that the Upper and Middle Kais were controlled by compaction and dominated by fractured porosity, while in contrast, the Lower Kais was controlled by dolomitization and dissolution diagenesis.
KW - Facies analysis
KW - Kais Formation
KW - West Papua Indonesia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037171407&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21660/2017.40.69647
DO - 10.21660/2017.40.69647
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85037171407
SN - 2186-2982
VL - 13
SP - 160
EP - 166
JO - International Journal of GEOMATE
JF - International Journal of GEOMATE
IS - 40
ER -