Examination of the effect of temperature, biomass characteristics, and heating rates on volatile release yield in palm kernel shell pyrolysis using volatile state kinetic modeling

Pandit Hernowo, Soen Steven, Amalia Syauket, Dede Rukmayadi, Anton Irawan, Carolus B. Rasrendra, Yazid Bindar, Ibnu Maulana Hidayatullah, Intan Clarissa Sophiana, Rita Dwi Ratnani, Komang Ria Saraswati

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The behavior of biomass pyrolysis can be predicted by analyzing its characteristics. This study aimed to model the release of volatiles across various temperatures, biomass properties, and heating rates. Palm kernel shells were pyrolyzed at 433–773 K with a heating rate of 5 K·min−1 using volatile-state kinetic modeling. The process began by calculating the biomass type number (NCT), which was used to determine volatile enhancement (VE), volatile release yield (YVY), product yield (Yi), and product mass fraction (yi). The kinetic parameters, including the activation energy for product formation (Eai), were derived through a fitting process. The results indicate a YVY of 70.77% within the devolatilization zone, corresponding to the degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose. The YVY increased with higher temperatures, lower NCT, and higher heating rates. The activation energy ranged from 155–185 kJ·mol⁻¹ for biocrude oil (BCO) and 149–186 kJ·mol⁻¹ for gas. The kinetic parameters from the volatile-state kinetic model demonstrated errors below 0.2% in comparison with the experimental data, confirming the model's accuracy and reliability.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBiofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • activation energy
  • bio-crude oil
  • biomass
  • devolatilization
  • pyrolysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Examination of the effect of temperature, biomass characteristics, and heating rates on volatile release yield in palm kernel shell pyrolysis using volatile state kinetic modeling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this