TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of Opioid-Free Anesthesia with Dexmedetomidine in Inhibiting Nociception during Laparoscopic Abdominal Procedures
T2 - A Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - Olata, Anisa
AU - Chandra, Susilo
AU - Marsaban, Arif H.M.
AU - Tantri, Aida Rosita
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Bali Journal of Anesthesiology.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Opioid anesthesia (OA) effectively suppresses surgical stress but has significant limitations, leading to the exploration of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) with dexmedetomidine to avoid opioid-related side effects. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of OFA with dexmedetomidine in controlling intraoperative nociception during laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 58 subjects undergoing abdominal laparoscopic surgery were enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned into two groups: the OFA group (n = 29) received a dexmedetomidine bolus of 1 μg/kg, and the OA group (n = 29) received a fentanyl bolus of 2 μg/kg. Both groups received standard balanced anesthesia. Hemodynamic instability events (hypotension, bradycardia, hypertension, and tachycardia), intraoperative fentanyl rescue requirement, ephedrine consumption, and 1-h postoperative pain numeric rating scale (NRS) were documented and analyzed. Results: The two groups showed significant differences in intraoperative rescue fentanyl requirement (2 vs. 29, P < 0.001) with the amount of fentanyl dosages (50 vs 150 μg, P = 0.004), the median post-intubation qNox value (44.1 ± 5.4 vs. 49 ± 9.8, P = 0.002), and NRS scale 1 h post-surgery (1 vs. 2, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the number of incidences of intraoperative hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and tachycardia incidence between the two groups. Conclusion: OFA with dexmedetomidine is more effective than OA in inhibiting intraoperative nociception during laparoscopic abdominal surgery as it reduces the rescue fentanyl requirement while providing stable intraoperative hemodynamics.
AB - Background: Opioid anesthesia (OA) effectively suppresses surgical stress but has significant limitations, leading to the exploration of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) with dexmedetomidine to avoid opioid-related side effects. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of OFA with dexmedetomidine in controlling intraoperative nociception during laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 58 subjects undergoing abdominal laparoscopic surgery were enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned into two groups: the OFA group (n = 29) received a dexmedetomidine bolus of 1 μg/kg, and the OA group (n = 29) received a fentanyl bolus of 2 μg/kg. Both groups received standard balanced anesthesia. Hemodynamic instability events (hypotension, bradycardia, hypertension, and tachycardia), intraoperative fentanyl rescue requirement, ephedrine consumption, and 1-h postoperative pain numeric rating scale (NRS) were documented and analyzed. Results: The two groups showed significant differences in intraoperative rescue fentanyl requirement (2 vs. 29, P < 0.001) with the amount of fentanyl dosages (50 vs 150 μg, P = 0.004), the median post-intubation qNox value (44.1 ± 5.4 vs. 49 ± 9.8, P = 0.002), and NRS scale 1 h post-surgery (1 vs. 2, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the number of incidences of intraoperative hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and tachycardia incidence between the two groups. Conclusion: OFA with dexmedetomidine is more effective than OA in inhibiting intraoperative nociception during laparoscopic abdominal surgery as it reduces the rescue fentanyl requirement while providing stable intraoperative hemodynamics.
KW - Dexmedetomidine
KW - hemodynamic instability
KW - laparoscopic abdominal surgery
KW - nociception
KW - opioid-free anesthesia
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85213246342
U2 - 10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_199_24
DO - 10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_199_24
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85213246342
SN - 2549-2276
VL - 8
SP - 227
EP - 233
JO - Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
JF - Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
IS - 4
ER -