TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of inhaled nebulised unfractionated heparin to prevent intubation or death in hospitalised patients with COVID-19
T2 - an investigator-initiated international meta-trial of randomised clinical studies
AU - van Haren, Frank M.P.
AU - Valle, Sarah J.
AU - Neto, Ary Serpa
AU - Schultz, Marcus J.
AU - Laffey, John G.
AU - Artigas, Antonio
AU - Dixon, Barry
AU - Vilaseca, Alicia B.
AU - Barbera, Ruben A.
AU - Ismail, Tarek I.
AU - Mahrous, Rabab S.
AU - Badr, Mohamed
AU - DeNucci, Gilberto
AU - Sverdloff, Carlos
AU - Camprubi-Rimblas, Marta
AU - Cosgrave, David W.
AU - McNicholas, Bairbre
AU - Cody, Catriona
AU - Curley, Gerard
AU - Smoot, Thomas L.
AU - Staas, Sabrina
AU - Sann, Khine
AU - Sas, Caitlin
AU - Belani, Anusha
AU - Hillman, Christopher
AU - Manggala, Sidharta Kusuma
AU - Aditianingsih, Dita
AU - Sugiarto, Adhrie
AU - Yulianti, Mira
AU - Herikurniawan, Herikurniawan
AU - Sinto, Robert
AU - Auerkari, Aino Nindya
AU - Permana, Septian Adi
AU - Woodcock, Ashley
AU - Carroll, Mary
AU - Wilkinson, Tom
AU - Singh, Dave
AU - Shute, Janis Kay
AU - Carroll, Miles
AU - Page, Clive
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Background: Inhaled nebulised unfractionated heparin (UFH) has a strong rationale as a treatment for severe respiratory infections, including COVID-19, due to its antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and anti-coagulant properties, which may prevent viral entry, lung injury progression, and pulmonary thrombosis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of inhaled nebulised UFH to prevent intubation or death in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Methods: In this prospective, a priori set up and defined, collaborative meta-trial of six randomised clinical studies, adult hospitalised but not intubated COVID-19 patients were randomly assigned to inhaled nebulised UFH on top of standard of care or standard of care alone. The dose and method of nebulisation was specific to each study. The primary outcome was intubation or death, assessed at the longest follow-up after randomisation. The meta-trial was registered atClinicalTrials.govIDNCT04635241. Findings: Between June 2020 and December 2022, 478 patients from 10 hospitals in six countries (Argentina, Brazil, Egypt, Indonesia, Ireland and USA) were enrolled. The odds ratio (OR) for intubation or death was 0.43 (0.26–0.73, p = 0.001); the OR for in-hospital mortality was 0.26 (0.13–0.54, p < 0.001) with inhaled nebulised UFH compared to standard of care alone. There were no safety issues reported, including no instances of pulmonary or systemic bleeding in the nebulised UFH group. Interpretation: In patients hospitalised but not intubated for COVID-19, inhaled nebulised UFH prevented intubation and reduced mortality, without causing pulmonary or systemic bleeding. Funding: The Sponsor of the meta-trial was the INHALE-HEP Collaborative Research Group (CRG); investigators of each contributing study were members of the INHALE-HEP CRG. No funding was received for the meta-trial. The Brazilian study was funded by The J.R. Moulton Charity Trust. The Irish study was funded by a Grant from Science Foundation Ireland to Cúram, the SFI's Centre for Research in Medical Devices (Research Centre Award Reference:13/RC/2073).
AB - Background: Inhaled nebulised unfractionated heparin (UFH) has a strong rationale as a treatment for severe respiratory infections, including COVID-19, due to its antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and anti-coagulant properties, which may prevent viral entry, lung injury progression, and pulmonary thrombosis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of inhaled nebulised UFH to prevent intubation or death in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Methods: In this prospective, a priori set up and defined, collaborative meta-trial of six randomised clinical studies, adult hospitalised but not intubated COVID-19 patients were randomly assigned to inhaled nebulised UFH on top of standard of care or standard of care alone. The dose and method of nebulisation was specific to each study. The primary outcome was intubation or death, assessed at the longest follow-up after randomisation. The meta-trial was registered atClinicalTrials.govIDNCT04635241. Findings: Between June 2020 and December 2022, 478 patients from 10 hospitals in six countries (Argentina, Brazil, Egypt, Indonesia, Ireland and USA) were enrolled. The odds ratio (OR) for intubation or death was 0.43 (0.26–0.73, p = 0.001); the OR for in-hospital mortality was 0.26 (0.13–0.54, p < 0.001) with inhaled nebulised UFH compared to standard of care alone. There were no safety issues reported, including no instances of pulmonary or systemic bleeding in the nebulised UFH group. Interpretation: In patients hospitalised but not intubated for COVID-19, inhaled nebulised UFH prevented intubation and reduced mortality, without causing pulmonary or systemic bleeding. Funding: The Sponsor of the meta-trial was the INHALE-HEP Collaborative Research Group (CRG); investigators of each contributing study were members of the INHALE-HEP CRG. No funding was received for the meta-trial. The Brazilian study was funded by The J.R. Moulton Charity Trust. The Irish study was funded by a Grant from Science Foundation Ireland to Cúram, the SFI's Centre for Research in Medical Devices (Research Centre Award Reference:13/RC/2073).
KW - ARDS
KW - COVID-19
KW - Inhaled heparin
KW - Intubation
KW - Meta-trial
KW - Mortality
KW - Nebulised heparin
KW - Pandemic
KW - Randomised trial
KW - Respiratory failure
KW - SARS-CoV-2
KW - Unfractionated heparin
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020474704
U2 - 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103339
DO - 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103339
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105020474704
SN - 2589-5370
VL - 88
JO - EClinicalMedicine
JF - EClinicalMedicine
M1 - 103339
ER -