TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation procedural skills training on second-year student using modified Peyton’s Four-Step approach during COVID-19 pandemic
AU - Heriwardito, Aldy
AU - Ramlan, Andi Ade Wijaya
AU - Basith, Abd
AU - Aristya, Lara
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article. We would like to thank the staff of the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia for their support in this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Airway emergency is the reason behind competency in mask ventilation and intubation skills for doctors. Procedural skills are taught through face-to-face training. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on the education system, including medical education. The face-to-face training method cannot be carried out and requires a modification to an online method. Therefore, Peyton’s Four-Step Approach is modified to adapt this change. Objective: Assessing the effectiveness of learning methods between modified Peyton’s Four-Step approach and classic Peyton’s Four Step approach in learning basic skills of mask ventilation and intubation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: This was an experimental study with two groups of subjects in the Basic ClinicalSkills module of endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation at the Faculty ofMedicine, Universitas Indonesia during February-June 2022. The first group received training with classic Peyton’s Four-Step approach and another group with modified Peyton’s Four-Step approach. Both groups were tested and assessed using rubric score and global rating score, and asked to fill a feedback questionnaire. Results: This study was conducted with 133 students in the classic group and 96 students in the modified group. The median rubric score was 21.2 for both groups and the global rating score showed 82%and 78% students passed, for classic and modified group respectively. Therubric score and global rating score, also the pass rate between two learningmethods showed no significant results (P > 0.05). The satisfaction and self-confidence questionnaires got answers ‘agree and strongly agree’ for all questions. Conclusion: The learning method using modified and classic Peyton Four-StepApproach were equally effective for learning basic skill of endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation for students of the Faculty of Medicine,University of Indonesia. Both methods provided equal students’ satisfaction and self-confidence.
AB - Background: Airway emergency is the reason behind competency in mask ventilation and intubation skills for doctors. Procedural skills are taught through face-to-face training. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on the education system, including medical education. The face-to-face training method cannot be carried out and requires a modification to an online method. Therefore, Peyton’s Four-Step Approach is modified to adapt this change. Objective: Assessing the effectiveness of learning methods between modified Peyton’s Four-Step approach and classic Peyton’s Four Step approach in learning basic skills of mask ventilation and intubation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: This was an experimental study with two groups of subjects in the Basic ClinicalSkills module of endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation at the Faculty ofMedicine, Universitas Indonesia during February-June 2022. The first group received training with classic Peyton’s Four-Step approach and another group with modified Peyton’s Four-Step approach. Both groups were tested and assessed using rubric score and global rating score, and asked to fill a feedback questionnaire. Results: This study was conducted with 133 students in the classic group and 96 students in the modified group. The median rubric score was 21.2 for both groups and the global rating score showed 82%and 78% students passed, for classic and modified group respectively. Therubric score and global rating score, also the pass rate between two learningmethods showed no significant results (P > 0.05). The satisfaction and self-confidence questionnaires got answers ‘agree and strongly agree’ for all questions. Conclusion: The learning method using modified and classic Peyton Four-StepApproach were equally effective for learning basic skill of endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation for students of the Faculty of Medicine,University of Indonesia. Both methods provided equal students’ satisfaction and self-confidence.
KW - Clinical skill
KW - intubation
KW - medical student
KW - online learning
KW - Peyton’s Four Step approach
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170049072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10872981.2023.2256540
DO - 10.1080/10872981.2023.2256540
M3 - Article
C2 - 37679958
AN - SCOPUS:85170049072
SN - 1087-2981
VL - 28
JO - Medical education online
JF - Medical education online
IS - 1
M1 - 2256540
ER -